IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
#16
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
I just booked a flight (UK domestic route on Flybe) yesterday evening. The charge to check baggage equated to another 50% on top of the basic return fare but is something I'm more than happy enough to pay; especially when trying to squeeze everything you need into a carry on bag just isn't feasible a lot of the time.
Anyhow, both of Canada's major airlines are against a standardised size, and have no plans to change their current size limit.
Air Canada, West Jet say no to standardized carry-on size - British Columbia - CBC News
#17
Account Closed
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 4,891
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
The base fare was £75 and charge for checked baggage was £33.
#18
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
In fact I go the other way and usually put a bag in the hold because I can't be asked to mess around in the mindless scrum of people trying to find overhead space in the cabin. That is more hassle than waiting a couple of minutes for a bag. As is having the space for your feet crammed with stuff. Alaska have a policy if the bag isn't at reclaim 20 minutes after the aircraft got to the gate you get $25 or 2500 miles. I have never yet walked from an Alaska flight to baggage reclaim and got there before my bag.
Never have I lost a bag, or anything from it since I started flying in the 1960s. We've had one flight were the bags were delayed and that was because of a very tight connection at ORD when our connecting fight was late. (Jinxed it now)
#19
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
The counter argument to that is why should I who doesn't have a checked bag, and has a reasonable sized carry on, pay the same as someone who is dumping a 50lb bag in the hold. It costs the airline to carry the bag, so why should I pay for something I don't need.
In fact I go the other way and usually put a bag in the hold because I can't be asked to mess around in the mindless scrum of people trying to find overhead space in the cabin. That is more hassle than waiting a couple of minutes for a bag. As is having the space for your feet crammed with stuff. Alaska have a policy if the bag isn't at reclaim 20 minutes after the aircraft got to the gate you get $25 or 2500 miles. I have never yet walked from an Alaska flight to baggage reclaim and got there before my bag.
Never have I lost a bag, or anything from it since I started flying in the 1960s. We've had one flight were the bags were delayed and that was because of a very tight connection at ORD when our connecting fight was late. (Jinxed it now)
In fact I go the other way and usually put a bag in the hold because I can't be asked to mess around in the mindless scrum of people trying to find overhead space in the cabin. That is more hassle than waiting a couple of minutes for a bag. As is having the space for your feet crammed with stuff. Alaska have a policy if the bag isn't at reclaim 20 minutes after the aircraft got to the gate you get $25 or 2500 miles. I have never yet walked from an Alaska flight to baggage reclaim and got there before my bag.
Never have I lost a bag, or anything from it since I started flying in the 1960s. We've had one flight were the bags were delayed and that was because of a very tight connection at ORD when our connecting fight was late. (Jinxed it now)
Like I said, I travel with a small carry on, I'll check it if they ask simply because I hate carrying it on, but I will not pay 25 dollars each way to check it. I'd prefer to, but the cost to check it isn't worth it, maybe is it were 5 or 10, I'd be more inclined, but the 25 or whatever it is now, not worth it.
If Southwest flew out of Bellingham, I'd be using them, but Seattle is the closest and it's a bit too far to use as a alternate airport to Vancouver and parking at Sea tac is pricey.
#20
Just Joined
Joined: Jun 2015
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 12
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
When I flew over here and checked my bags in I told the girl that I wanted the yellow bag to go to Honduras and the blue one to Ontario. She replied that she could not possible do that. So I asked her why not as they had managed it fine the week before. Boom Boom
#21
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
Delta is going to try preboarding the carry-on: Delta Wants to Pre-Load Your Carry-On Bags for You
#22
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
Delta is going to try preboarding the carry-on: Delta Wants to Pre-Load Your Carry-On Bags for You
#23
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Midlands - MA - CO-CA
Posts: 2,763
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
Delta is going to try preboarding the carry-on: Delta Wants to Pre-Load Your Carry-On Bags for You
#24
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
How so? A business is, broadly speaking, taxed based on the aggregate of all receipts, with very few exceptions, then all the allowable expenses, charges, and deductions are made, which are many and various. You can slice and dice the income and deductions in various ways, and change the order in which income is added and deductions made, but at the end of the day you calculate aggregate income, then subtract the deductions and levy tax on the difference. What are airlines doing that is different?
#25
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
How so? A business is, broadly speaking, taxed based on the aggregate of all receipts, with very few exceptions, then all the allowable expenses, charges, and deductions are made, which are many and various. You can slice and dice the income and deductions in various ways, and change the order in which income is added and deductions made, but at the end of the day you calculate aggregate income, then subtract the deductions and levy tax on the difference. What are airlines doing that is different?
#26
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
#28
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
Even if airlines stuck to their current rules, if everyone brought a bag that size they wouldn't fit them all in the overheads. I fly about once a week on average, always check my luggage and can't remember the last time I had to wait more than 10 minutes by the carousel. There was one exception, where I went to the UK on a quick, under 48 hour turnaround and had to get to a meeting very quickly after landing. That time I put all my stuff in a big (regulation size) carry-on, and felt a massive bell end for doing so.
#29
Re: IATA Considering Smaller Carry On Bag Size
I believe they would, if everyone placed their regulation-sized bags on their edge (if a suitcase) and end-on, like slices of toast in a rack, which is how the bins are designed to work, and work very well.