DACA etc.
#16
Re: DACA etc.
Agreed that 'Hispanic' or 'Latino' vote doesn't exist as a voting bloc. A Cuban emigre living in Florida is far more likely to vote Republican than a Mexican emigre living in California.
Last edited by BritInParis; Jan 13th 2018 at 12:21 am. Reason: Typo
#17
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: DACA etc.
I obviously can not talk for the Democrats's but assume they are expecting a higher conversion rate for DACA recipients than the average and would also be taking into account the longer term, with their families added into the equation.
#18
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,900
Re: DACA etc.
Very few of the DACAs are going to be political junkies who wish someone would make a set of baseball cards featuring congressmen, any more than the rest of the public. On the list of priorities for why they want to stay in the country, "so I can vote for Democrats on election day" is not going to be on there.
The net effect on presidential elections is going to be miniscule, and at lower levels, totally unpredictable . . . and I think more than a few progressive (and conservative) activists are going to be surprised at how the religious backgrounds and social conservatism of the countries many of the DACAs come from, will interact negatively with many progressive social causes. That is not a mystery, but few have been paying attention until now.
It would be very unwise decision making to base support or opposition to this on trying to read electoral tea-leaves for thirty years from now.
Last edited by carcajou; Jan 13th 2018 at 1:57 am.
#19
Re: DACA etc.
The TPS for El Salvador which will ceased in 18 months was put in place due to earthquakes which happened 17 years ago. That's awfully long time to give you the opportunity for AOS. The overall number of people holding TPS is 325,000 which is a lot in absolute terms but relatively speaking I'm not sure that's going to swing an election for you given eligibility, distribution, turnout, etc.. The 1.9 million people eligible for DACA on the other hand probably would.
The fact that so many people have been on TPS for so long is just an indication of political paralysis, because it clearly isn't sensible to send 200,000 Salvadoreans back to El Salvador, that's in no-one's interest. It will destabilize the country and apparently they've got about 200,000 US citizen children as well.
I agree that they should never have been on TPS for as long as they were but that was a decision taken by Bush and Obama, just kick the can down the road in some vague hope of immigration reform.
#20
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: DACA etc.
Sounds like we are now getting immigration reform.
#21
Re: DACA etc.
Personally I think it's silly anyway because I can't see all the Puerto Ricans who've moved to Florida recently voting Republican anyway.
If they had any sense they'd be bending over backwards to rebuild Puerto Rico.
#22
Re: DACA etc.
The Republican house bill is a joke and won't go anywhere. Whatever this is isn't going to be some major degree of reform, it's going to be fiddling around the edges. The real sticking point is whether people on DACA can get citizenship, because the Democrats don't want to end sponsorship of parents and that's why the Republicans don't want people on DACA to get citizenship.
My bet in the end is it will be some sort of conditional permanent residency and the only way to get citizenship will be to qualify for it through the regular immigration system.
My bet in the end is it will be some sort of conditional permanent residency and the only way to get citizenship will be to qualify for it through the regular immigration system.
#23
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,900
Re: DACA etc.
It's not about Texas and it's not purely about Presidential elections either, the Texas congressional map is heavily gerrymandered. Florida and Arizona are the ones they're worried about. If those two States generally went Democratic they would have a tough time getting the votes in the Senate or winning the Presidency.
Personally I think it's silly anyway because I can't see all the Puerto Ricans who've moved to Florida recently voting Republican anyway.
If they had any sense they'd be bending over backwards to rebuild Puerto Rico.
Personally I think it's silly anyway because I can't see all the Puerto Ricans who've moved to Florida recently voting Republican anyway.
If they had any sense they'd be bending over backwards to rebuild Puerto Rico.
Moreover theoretical DACA voters are not the only people potentially being added to the Florida and Arizona rolls. "Reagan Democrats" from the Northeast and Upper Midwest who never went back to the Democrats are retiring and keep moving down in droves.
The electoral patterns in Florida and Arizona haven't changed much in a generation, except there are fewer Democrats in higher office in both now (despite both states being more Hispanic now, than then). A generation ago at least Arizona had Dennis DeConcini and Janet Napolitano, and Florida had Lawton Chiles and Bob Graham.
Florida remains what it was 25 years ago - a 50/50 state that tips whatever way the national wind is blowing. Arizona remains what it was 25 years ago - a state that's winnable when there is a Strong Democrat / Weak Republican combination, like in 1996.
Legalising a million or so Dreamers isn't going to change any of that, at any electoral level.
#24
Re: DACA etc.
This is the main reason the Republicans oppose it, you only have to read the legislation they've introduced which makes parents of US citizens a non-immigrant category that has to be renewed every 5 years.
Republicans moving down from the midwest and northeast isn't going to make any difference given that NY, NJ, IL and various other States usually go Democratic in statewide elections and Ohio for example is a swing State.
Last edited by Steve_; Jan 18th 2018 at 10:52 pm.
#25
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,900
Re: DACA etc.
The parents will be even less inclined to vote than the kids.
If these are such guaranteed Democratic votes, why haven't the Democrats been more successful in Florida and Arizona?
To the extent that this is about voters at all, it is about existing voters, and the Republicans not wanting to tick off the social-conservative crazies in their base who might primary them, and the Democrats not wanting to tick off their base in Silicon Valley who can fund a primary challenge to them. Neither side gives a hoot about Dreamers themselves, nor are they engaging in a senseless game of trying to predict an Arizona House race a decade from now.
If these are such guaranteed Democratic votes, why haven't the Democrats been more successful in Florida and Arizona?
To the extent that this is about voters at all, it is about existing voters, and the Republicans not wanting to tick off the social-conservative crazies in their base who might primary them, and the Democrats not wanting to tick off their base in Silicon Valley who can fund a primary challenge to them. Neither side gives a hoot about Dreamers themselves, nor are they engaging in a senseless game of trying to predict an Arizona House race a decade from now.
#26
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: DACA etc.
All I know is I'm getting furloughed on Monday. Thanks Democrats.
#29
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: DACA etc.
"But Trump..."
Please, give it a rest.
Please, give it a rest.