2016 Election

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 17th 2015, 9:25 pm
  #91  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

I think it may be awhile before the republicans find their way into the White House, the party seems to be largely nuts these days who shouldn't be in power of any sort.
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Apr 17th 2015, 9:37 pm
  #92  
SUPER MODERATOR
 
Jerseygirl's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 88,021
Jerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Jsmth321
I think it may be awhile before the republicans find their way into the White House, the party seems to be largely nuts these days who shouldn't be in power of any sort.
Don't bank on it. IMO Clinton will get the Dem nomination...hopefully it will be a hot day in hell before she is POTUS.

Last edited by Jerseygirl; Apr 17th 2015 at 9:42 pm.
Jerseygirl is offline  
Old Apr 17th 2015, 9:39 pm
  #93  
Under blue skies
 
WEBlue's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: East Anglia->New England
Posts: 3,624
WEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond reputeWEBlue has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
...I can state that among my peers there is a genuine dislike for Jeb Bush and a sense that he would go down to defeat in a contest with Hillary.
<snip>
Many of us believe that both the Party and the country would have been better off if Jeb had been our candidate in 2000 rather than "W."
Not sure I understand this... these two statements seem to contradict each other.

Are you saying that W tainted the Bush name beyond redemption?
WEBlue is offline  
Old Apr 17th 2015, 9:45 pm
  #94  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
This is primarily because my side of the aisle has a significant proportion of purists who would stay home on Election Day rather than taint themselves by voting for someone who stands for less than 100% of their values. We could call this the "Suicide Wing" of the Party.
One could argue both parties seem to be exhibiting a suicide wing right now. Which side will have more stay at home?
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Apr 17th 2015, 10:11 pm
  #95  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by WEBlue
Not sure I understand this... these two statements seem to contradict each other.

Are you saying that W tainted the Bush name beyond redemption?
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
One could argue both parties seem to be exhibiting a suicide wing right now. Which side will have more stay at home?
I don’t think so. Jeb’s support for Common Core and his stance on immigration causes a loss of support amongst the purists on the right. That is, I believe, why so many on the right will refuse to vote for him. Democrats are far more pragmatic (and their ranks are crammed with people who are almost entirely devoid of any knowledge as to the issues), that is why I think Hillary would win in a Bush – Clinton match-up.

On the other hand, Jeb is a much better politician than W – some say streets smarter than W – and could explain his policies to the centrists and independents – but not to the satisfaction of hard conservatives. Had he run and been elected President in 2000 rather than W, I have no doubt that the country would have been better off.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Apr 17th 2015, 10:33 pm
  #96  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Democrats are far more pragmatic (and their ranks are crammed with people who are almost entirely devoid of any knowledge as to the issues).
Careful when generalizing, there are plenty on both sides who are entirely devoid of any knowledge of the issues.

One might point to the Republican voters in relatively poor states who are desperate for the repeal of the ACA despite the fact they will lose their recently gained health coverage.

On the other hand, Jeb is a much better politician than W – some say streets smarter than W – and could explain his policies to the centrists and independents – but not to the satisfaction of hard conservatives. Had he run and been elected President in 2000 rather than W, I have no doubt that the country would have been better off.
Wouldn't be hard to be smarter than W! I suspect though that whichever president was in charge on 9/11 would still have been railroaded into pointless wars and the resulting mess would likely have been very similar.
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Apr 17th 2015, 11:07 pm
  #97  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by sir_eccles
Careful when generalizing, there are plenty on both sides who are entirely devoid of any knowledge of the issues.

One might point to the Republican voters in relatively poor states who are desperate for the repeal of the ACA despite the fact they will lose their recently gained health coverage.



Wouldn't be hard to be smarter than W! I suspect though that whichever president was in charge on 9/11 would still have been railroaded into pointless wars and the resulting mess would likely have been very similar.
Noted, as to the generalizing. Sorry, a tendency hard to resist. The Republican Party is the party of the Middle Class - where educational standards are valued.

It's hard to blame people for disliking the ACA when, because of the "ACA," they have lost health care they were perfectly content with and now have to buy much more expensive health insurance on the exchanges where their co-pays are much higher than before. Others dislike it because their hours were cut so that their employer could end their coverage - a double whammy.

Considering that George W. Bush graduated from both Yale and Harvard, where he earned an MBA, he really isn't a dummy, although his speech patterns make him sound deceptively stupid. He is, in fact, the only President to have earned an MBA. It was just unfortunate for him that 9/11 happened on his watch. His book "Decision Points" explains his actions fairly well.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Apr 17th 2015, 11:27 pm
  #98  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Noted, as to the generalizing. Sorry, a tendency hard to resist. The Republican Party is the party of the Middle Class - where educational standards are valued.
Hmm, current evidence of various Republican governors cutting education in states like Kansas and Arizona would seem to suggest otherwise.

I believe the Republican party of today is most certainly not the one of perhaps even as short a time as a decade ago.
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Apr 27th 2015, 5:02 am
  #99  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Rumor from New York is Jeb will be announcing tomorrow in Miami.

The source was some rich democrat on a radio show reported by NY Post, so who know's if true.
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Apr 29th 2015, 1:30 pm
  #100  
I have a comma problem
 
SultanOfSwing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
SultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

According to his arsebook feed and a few other news sources, Bernie Sanders is intending to run as a Democrat and will announce this tomorrow.

This is very encouraging, IMO. He will cause Hillary to pull left somewhat, in a bid to secure the support of the progressive Democrats. He will also be (should he win the primary) a strong candidate against any of the current crop of Republicans, so he may force them to put forward more moderate candidates themselves.

If he wins the presidential election, it could be just what the US needs to start getting their arses in gear as a world power again.
SultanOfSwing is offline  
Old Apr 29th 2015, 4:02 pm
  #101  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
According to his arsebook feed and a few other news sources, Bernie Sanders is intending to run as a Democrat and will announce this tomorrow.

This is very encouraging, IMO. He will cause Hillary to pull left somewhat, in a bid to secure the support of the progressive Democrats.

If he wins the presidential election, it could be just what the US needs to start getting their arses in gear as a world power again.
This is interesting. Please explain to us your theory as to how America moving as far as possible to the left (Bernie's position) would get America's arse in gear as a world power.

Now if the end result of a massive move to the left, while keeping America as the focus (National Socialism) is the idea, sort of like the path certain nations took in the 1930s, then perhaps your theory is correct...do you want that?

It's more likely that Bernie's real idea is to create a vast majority of parasitic voters who will keep the Democrat Party in power forever, a sort of one-party system like the former German Democratic Republic (DDR). Not sure how that makes us a world power - but you can expand on that.

I think if Bernie becomes their candidate (an impossibility), the Republican primary voters will likely nominate Ted Cruz. Otherwise, either Jeb Bush or Scott Walker will be the standard bearer.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Apr 29th 2015, 4:16 pm
  #102  
I have a comma problem
 
SultanOfSwing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
SultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
This is interesting. Please explain to us your theory as to how America moving as far as possible to the left (Bernie's position) would get America's arse in gear as a world power.

Now if the end result of a massive move to the left, while keeping America as the focus (National Socialism) is the idea, sort of like the path certain nations took in the 1930s, then perhaps your theory is correct...do you want that?

It's more likely that Bernie's real idea is to create a vast majority of parasitic voters who will keep the Democrat Party in power forever, a sort of one-party system like the former German Democratic Republic (DDR). Not sure how that makes us a world power - but you can expand on that.

I think if Bernie becomes their candidate (an impossibility), the Republican primary voters will likely nominate Ted Cruz. Otherwise, either Jeb Bush or Scott Walker will be the standard bearer.
If he were as far to the left as you say he was, there would be no way he'd have been able to be the longest serving independent member of the Senate.

I would address the rest of that post but quite frankly it is ridiculous to suggest that a man who supports a Scandanavian-style social democracy to National Socialism. Clearly you're another typically reactionary conservative and it really isn't worth my time.
SultanOfSwing is offline  
Old Apr 29th 2015, 6:05 pm
  #103  
Magnificently Withering
 
Oakvillian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 6,891
Oakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
This is interesting. Please explain to us your theory as to how America moving as far as possible to the left (Bernie's position) would get America's arse in gear as a world power.

Now if the end result of a massive move to the left, while keeping America as the focus (National Socialism) is the idea, sort of like the path certain nations took in the 1930s, then perhaps your theory is correct...do you want that?

It's more likely that Bernie's real idea is to create a vast majority of parasitic voters who will keep the Democrat Party in power forever, a sort of one-party system like the former German Democratic Republic (DDR). Not sure how that makes us a world power - but you can expand on that.

I think if Bernie becomes their candidate (an impossibility), the Republican primary voters will likely nominate Ted Cruz. Otherwise, either Jeb Bush or Scott Walker will be the standard bearer.
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
If he were as far to the left as you say he was, there would be no way he'd have been able to be the longest serving independent member of the Senate.

I would address the rest of that post but quite frankly it is ridiculous to suggest that a man who supports a Scandanavian-style social democracy to National Socialism. Clearly you're another typically reactionary conservative and it really isn't worth my time.
I was only popping into the Trailer Park en passant to check if anyone had said anything interesting on the car thread, but felt the need to comment here that in his second paragraph Mr Aetius has, in all but name, invoked Godwin and therefore lost the argument by default. All hail President Bernie, I suppose, in that case
Oakvillian is offline  
Old Apr 29th 2015, 6:27 pm
  #104  
BE Forum Addict
 
Anian's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: WA state
Posts: 3,062
Anian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Today I learned that Bernie Sanders is Hitler in disguise.
Anian is offline  
Old Apr 29th 2015, 6:30 pm
  #105  
I love my brick!
 
zargof's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Peachy
Posts: 9,304
zargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Anian
Today I learned that Bernie Sanders is Hitler in disguise.
Well the Muslim Obama was Hitler, so it makes sense that the Jewish Sanders is also Hitler.
zargof is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.