By Dr. Earl Evleth PhD
December 13, 2006


How did we go from winning the war in Iraq to losing overnight? Was
this decided by the same committee that changed "Peking" to "Beijing"?

These word changes are a fortiori evidence that liberals are part of a
conspiracy. On what date did "horrible" and "actress" vanish from the
English language to be replaced with "horrific" and "actor"? Who
decided that? (Meanwhile, I'm still writing "Puff Daddy" in my nightly
dream journal when everybody else has started calling him "Diddy.")

When did "B.C." (before Christ) and "A.D." (anno Domini, "in the year
of the Lord") get replaced with "BCE" (before the common era) and "CE"
(common era)? "Withdrawal" is "redeployment," "liberal" is
"progressive," and "traitorous" is "patriotic."

These new linguistic conventions - like going from "winning" to
"losing" in Iraq - simply spread like an invisible bacterial
invasion.

To be sure, last month the Democrats did win a narrow majority in
Congress for the first time in more than a decade. And it cannot be
denied that for the past 50 years, Democrats have orchestrated
humiliating foreign policy defeats for America. So it is understandable
that some might interpret their midterm gains as a mandate for another
humiliating defeat.

But that's not what the Democrats told Americans when they were running
for office. To the contrary, they claimed to be gun-totin' hawks. A
shockingly high number of Democratic candidates this year actually
fought in wars. And not just the war on poverty, either - real wars,
against men with guns.

It was a specific plan of Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
chair Rep. Rahm Emanuel to fake out the voters by recruiting anti-war
veterans to run against Republicans. (And when did "chairman" become
"chair"?)

To the credit of the voters - especially the American Legion and VFW
- the Democrats didn't fool enough Americans to even match the
average midterm gains for the party out of power.

But the point is: You can't run as a phony patriot and then claim your
victory is a mandate for surrender. That would be like awarding
yourself undeserved Purple Hearts and then pretending to throw them
over the White House wall in protest. No, that's not fair - nothing
could be as contemptible as throwing someone else's medals on the
ground in protest.

Is it the report of the "Iraq Surrender Group" that suddenly caused
everyone to say we're losing?

The ISG report was about what you'd expect if the ladies from "The
View" were asked to come up with a victory plan for Iraq. We need to
ask Syria to tell Hamas to stop calling for the destruction of Israel.
Duh! "Dear Hamas, Do you like killing Jews, or do you LIKE killing
Jews? Check yes or no."

Most of the esteemed members of the ISG were last seen on the "Dead or
Alive?" Web site. Vernon Jordan's most recent claim to fame was getting
Monica Lewinsky a job at Revlon when she was threatening Bill Clinton
with the truth. He's going to figure out an honorable way to get out of
Iraq?

We're still trying to figure out a six-part test from some decision
Sandra Day O'Connor wrote back in 1984, but now she's going to tell us
what to do in Iraq.

Have things changed on the ground in Iraq? Are our troops being routed?
Hardly. The number of U.S. fatalities has gone from a high of 860
deaths in 2004 to 845 in 2005, to 695 through November of this year. If
the Islamic fascists double their rate of killing Americans in the next
month, there will still be fewer American fatalities in Iraq this year
than in the previous two years.

Admittedly, it would be a little easier to track our progress in Iraq
if the Pentagon would tell us how many of them we're killing, but
apparently our Pentagon is too spooked by the insurgents posing as
civilians to mention the deaths of our enemies.

Moreover, it might seem churlish to mention the number of Islamic
lunatics we've killed during the holy month of Ramadan. Half the time
we do anything to them, it's "the holy month of Ramadan." It's always
Ramadan. When on Earth is Ramadan over?

It's true that no one anticipated that al-Qaida sympathizers would
stream into Iraq to fight the Great Satan after Saddam fled to a spider
hole, but that's because everyone expected al-Qaida to be fighting us
here.

Like "Peking," that's something else we can't say anymore: the amazing
absence of another 9/11-style terrorist attack in the past five years.
The heart of the insurgency in Iraq is, by definition, composed of
Islamic terrorists who hate the Great Satan, own an overnight bag and
are willing to travel to kill Americans. But don't worry: The Iraq
Surrender Group feels sure they won't come here if we pull out of Iraq.


If absolutely nothing changed in Iraq over the next few years - if it
didn't continue to get better and if the savages never lost heart (I'm
assuming they subscribe to "TimesSelect") - by 2010, 6,000 brave
American troops will have died to prevent another 9/11 terrorist attack
on American soil for a decade.

If that's a war Americans think we're "losing," Osama bin Laden was
right: We are a paper tiger.

"Earl Evleth" <earl.evleth@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1166110744.496725.282450@f1g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
    > By Dr. Earl Evleth PhD
    > December 13, 2006
    > How did we go from winning the war in Iraq to losing overnight? Was
    > this decided by the same committee that changed "Peking" to "Beijing"?
Since you have not yet been able to percieve that this is a news group about
traveling in Europe, I am not surprised that it has taken you so long to
understand that we have been losing ever since we captured Bagdad and failed
to secure it. At this rate you will soon discover that Hoover is no longer
President.

We are plagued by the evleth clones and the so called original is the worst

"Marc4UCB" <stagshrine@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
els7qk$u2c$1@agate.berkeley.edu...
    > "Earl Evleth" <earl.evleth@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    > news:1166110744.496725.282450@f1g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
    >> By Dr. Earl Evleth PhD
    >> December 13, 2006
    >> How did we go from winning the war in Iraq to losing overnight? Was
    >> this decided by the same committee that changed "Peking" to "Beijing"?
    > Since you have not yet been able to percieve that this is a news group
    > about traveling in Europe, I am not surprised that it has taken you so
    > long to understand that we have been losing ever since we captured Bagdad
    > and failed to secure it. At this rate you will soon discover that Hoover
    > is no longer President.
    >

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Marc4UCB wrote:

    > Since you have not yet been able to percieve that this is a news group about
    > traveling in Europe, I am not surprised that it has taken you so long to
    > understand that we have been losing ever since we captured Bagdad and failed
    > to secure it. At this rate you will soon discover that Hoover is no longer
    > President.

Please be aware that the original post was not really by Earl Evleth, but
by someone forging his name.

--
Yves Bellefeuille <yan@storm.ca>
Google users: To reply to posts, click "show options" next to the
poster's name, and then click "Reply" in the line that says:
"Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message"

On 14/12/06 23:56, in article pan.2006.12.14.22.56.57.554627@storm.ca, "Yves
Bellefeuille" <yan@storm.ca> wrote:

    > Please be aware that the original post was not really by Earl Evleth, but
    > by someone forging his name.

The culprit is known. His accomplice is gRunge who knows a forged posting
when he sees it but goes along with it for his personal agenda of
harassment. The posting "SURRENDER BY ANY OTHER NAME" came via googlegroups
using a forged name and address, and the ISP origin
is Chello.fr, the author is the notorious Cajun, aka Cochon Capitaliste
now posting under Zubenalgenubi <zubenelgenubi@hotmail.fr>, a 60 yr
old unemployed refugee from Nevada. This particular forgery is about the
100th posted since March of 2006 prior to which another address was used
(56 forgeries) and before than still another. gRunge loved this.

Ummmmm the return address says earl-evleth@yahoo.com. Your such an
addled old fool you don't even recognize your own nonsensical crap that
you post on the Internet. Chello is an ISP in Champs-sur-Marne France,
Champs-sur-Marne is not far from Paris. Well Duhhhhh how hard is it to
connect the dots to your flat at 6 r. François Gerbillon 75006 Paris?
I heard a LOT of people are planning to show up the 24th for the
réveillon chez vous. Is the Negro Boys choir from Clairvaux Prison
going to show up this year?

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:11:16 -0800, Zubenalgenubi wrote :

    >
    > Ummmmm the return address says earl-evleth@yahoo.com. Your such an addled
    > old fool you don't even recognize your own nonsensical crap that you post
    > on the Internet. Chello is an ISP in Champs-sur-Marne France,
    > Champs-sur-Marne is not far from Paris. Well Duhhhhh how hard is it to
    > connect the dots to your flat at 6 r. François Gerbillon 75006 Paris? I
    > heard a LOT of people are planning to show up the 24th for the réveillon
    > chez vous. Is the Negro Boys choir from Clairvaux Prison going to show up
    > this year?

You should read article L323-2 of the penal code and carefully note the
possible fine and prison penalties.

Le fait d'entraver ou de fausser le fonctionnement d'un STAD
est incriminé et prévu par l'article 323-2 c. pén. (ajout par la
LCEN). Ainsi, l'envoi de spams est couvert par cet article.

--
Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do
it himself. -- A.H. Weiler

Zubenalgenubi wrote:
    > Ummmmm the return address says earl-evleth@yahoo.com. Your such an
    > addled old fool you don't even recognize your own nonsensical crap that
    > you post on the Internet. Chello is an ISP in Champs-sur-Marne France,
    > Champs-sur-Marne is not far from Paris. Well Duhhhhh how hard is it to
    > connect the dots to your flat at 6 r. François Gerbillon 75006 Paris?
    > I heard a LOT of people are planning to show up the 24th for the
    > réveillon chez vous. Is the Negro Boys choir from Clairvaux Prison
    > going to show up this year?

Exactly! Earl's genuine e-mail address is NOT yahoo, idiot.
    >

On 16/12/06 7:12, in article em02oj02grj@news2.newsguy.com,
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

    > Exactly! Earl's genuine e-mail address is NOT yahoo, idiot.

He knows that, it is part of his game. He established the address
and it is traceable via the ISP message ID
in the case of the original posting was posting-host=89.156.99.199;
posting-account=5fPujg0AAACVZL7uZR1H5mMYta7Q4RHU.

I will not discuss how the identity of the author can be obtained
from that information, nor if it has been. But the name of the culprit is
otherwise known and has been cited a number of times on the internet. With
regard to Piggy's multiple forgeries and other postings I will only add at
this time, in French "les enchères montent". When the time comes it will
be revealed in what manner.

On 16/12/06 6:47, in article pan.2006.12.16.05.47.14.275435@localhost.local,
"JuanElorza" <juanElorza@localhost.local> wrote:

    > You should read article L323-2 of the penal code and carefully note the
    > possible fine and prison penalties.
    >
    > Le fait d'entraver ou de fausser le fonctionnement d'un STAD
    > est incriminé et prévu par l'article 323-2 c. pén. (ajout par la
    > LCEN). Ainsi, l'envoi de spams est couvert par cet article.


That particular part of the code I have not come across before.
Thanks for the reference, I have passed it on to interested
parties.

We have just terminated two law suits in our building, successfully
for our side of the issue. French judges get angry when the defendant (or
defend ants) commits gross excesses repetitively. In one case
the judge socked the defendants with and extra fine of several 10s
of megaeuros. In another case, where the first decision was appealed
the defendant got sock with a heavier fine because of the falsification
of documents. Appealing and losing can involve an increase in
the fines and even longer jail sentences.

One poster mentioned Clairvaux. This is a centrale and short termers
are not sent there. It is a relatively comfortable prison whereas
several years spent at Fresnes would be painful, it is overcrowded
and when is in lockdown most of the day. The food is terrible.

In fact, the Bastille at the time of the revolution had better food than
now.

I posted this a couple of years ago

*****


Meals in the Bastille, before the Revolution.

From Jacques Hillairet`s "Gibet, Piloris et Cachots du Vieux Paris".

This is, by the way, a "great book", if you want to read how people were
executed throughout French history. It was a bloody affair, sort of like
Texas today!

There is a chapter devoted to the Prison de la Bastille, the prison that
cause all the excitement at the time of the Revolution.  The prisons before
the Revolution were for mostly temporary use until punishment could be
handed out (like cutting of hands, or just plain hanging. The dead were
left hanging until the corpses decayed and fell. The gibet was located up
"the
hill" from the center of Paris in the area were Belleville (Montfaucon) is
now. The odor of the rotting corpses would reach Paris on a day when the
winds would blow the wrong way.  This was suppose to have a moralizing
effect on would-be killers.

Le roi would put important people in prison to let them cool off
a bit if they got politically too active and out of favor. But apparently
he
also paid the bills. The higher one`s status the better one ate. Note how
far down the list the lawyer (avocat) ranked.

We left it in French because it would loose some of its amusing tone
in English.  Hillairet was having some fun when he wrote this part.

Earl

*******

Le gouverneur touchait du roi, avons-nous dit, pour la nourriture et
l'entretien de ses prisonniers (habillement, blanchissage, chauffage et
éclairage), 50 livres par jour pour un prince du sang, 36 pour un maréchal
de France, 24 pour un lieutenant-général, 15 pour un conseiller au
Parlement, 10 pour un juge, un prêtre, un financier, 5 pour un avocat et un
bourgeois, 3 pour un petit bourgeois et 2 livres 10 sols pour les personnes
de condition inférieure.

Aussi les repas, qui étaient servis individuellement à 7 heures du matin
(déjeuner), à 11 heures (dîner) et à 6 heures du soir (souper), furent-ils
toujours copieux, voire même somptueux. Citons Marmontel, enfermé en 1759:
~
?Voilà mes deux geôliers qui rentrent avec des pyramides de plats dans les
mains, beau linge, belle faïence, cuillère et fourchette d'argent. Ce dîner
était gras; en voici le détail: un excellent potage, une tranche de b?uf
succulent, une cuisse de chapon bouilli ruisselant de graisse et fondant,
un
petit plat d'artichauts frits en marinade, un d'épinards, une très belle
poire de crésane, du raisin frais, une bouteille de vin vieux de Bourgogne
et du meilleur café de Moka?

Sous Louis XIV, quelques prisonniers demandérent au gouverneur d'avoir un
régime alimentaire plus modeste et de recevoir en argent ce qu'ils ne
mangeraient pas; ils proposèrent même au gouverneur de partager avec lui le
montant de l'économie qui scrait ainsi faite

Latude, qui avait été jusqu'alors un pauvre hère, ne s'est-il pas plaint de
ce que les poulets qu'on lui servait « étaient insuffisamment lardés »  ?
Tavernier, autre pauvre hère?un des sept prisonniers qui furent libérés le
14 juillet 1789 (il était enfermé depuis 1757) ?reçut, en supplément de ses
repas ordinaires, en mai 1787: une livre et demie de tabac, 4 bouteilles
d'eau-de-vie, 62 de vin, 31 de bière, 30 livres de pain, 3 livres de
chandelles, des pigeons, 2 livres de café, 3 de sucre; en novembre 1788: du
tabac, 4 bouteilles d'eau-de-vie, 60 de vin, 30 de bière, 2 livres de café,
3 de sucre, une dinde, des huîtres, des châtaignes, des pommes et des
poires; en mars 1789: du tabac , 4 bouteille es d 'eau-d e-vie, 45 de vin,
60 de bière, café, sucre, poulet, fromage...

Constantin de Renneville, cité plus haut, a énuméré dans son ouvrage les
repas qu'on lui servait: "Il y avait toujours plusieurs plats, potage,
entrée, relevées, dessert à chaque dîner, deux bouteilles de vin, bourgogne
ou champagne; on en servait une troisième pour les besoins de la journée,
aussi l'appétit le plus robuste ne suffisait-il pas à tout consommer .. Les
vendredis et jours de carême « j'avais, a-t-il dit, six plats et une soupe
d'écrevisses admirable. Parmi mon poisson, il y avait une vive fort belle,
une grande sole frite et une perche... Je demandais à mon geôlier si je
payerais ma nourriture. Il me dit que je n'avais qu'à demander ce qui,
naturellement, pourrait me faire plaisir et que Sa Majesté payait tout"

PS there are some restaurants around la Place de la Basille. Eat well
and remember.

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:12:41 +0100, Earl Evleth wrote :

    > On 16/12/06 7:12, in article em02oj02grj@news2.newsguy.com,
    > "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:
    >
    >> Exactly! Earl's genuine e-mail address is NOT yahoo, idiot.
    >
    > He knows that, it is part of his game. He established the address and it
    > is traceable via the ISP message ID in the case of the original posting
    > was posting-host=89.156.99.199;
    > posting-account=5fPujg0AAACVZL7uZR1H5mMYta7Q4RHU.
    >
    > I will not discuss how the identity of the author can be obtained from
    > that information, nor if it has been. But the name of the culprit is
    > otherwise known and has been cited a number of times on the internet.
    > With regard to Piggy's multiple forgeries and other postings I will only
    > add at this time, in French "les enchères montent". When the time comes
    > it will be revealed in what manner.

I hope he stops those heavy jokes, so you can drop the case. I
believe he is completely unaware of the possible consequences.

--
Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do
it himself. -- A.H. Weiler

The reason you left it in French, Earl is because you can neither read
nor write the language. Donna has to read it to you in English and she
basically told you to "**** off" when you asked her to translate this
one.

The poster is Earl Evleth his address is listed in the Pages Blanches

6, rue François Gerbillon
75006 Paris

Téléphone 01 45 48 67 20

"Zubenalgenubi" <zubenelgenubi@hotmail.fr> kirjoitti
viestissä:1166358361.296988.25030@16g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
The poster is Earl Evleth his address is listed in the Pages Blanches

6, rue François Gerbillon
75006 Paris

Téléphone 01 45 48 67 20


you don't mind to get lost from rte

If you don't like what is posted here JuanElzora then DO something
about it. If not than "**** off" as they say.