Education and GNVQ's
#1
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 317











Hey all
So i'm in a bit of a panic as I've only just realised that my other half might not meet the 12yr education requirements of the BC PNP. Can anyone give some advise please
My boyfriend has
Normal Uk schooling so 7 years at primary and 5 years at Secondary. He has GCSE'S (not good grades but has them)
As his GCSE'S where not too good he then went on to 6th form to study an intermediate GNVQ for 1 year which is the equivalent to 4 GCSE'S at A-C.
He then completed 1 year at tertiary college and left. He has a certificate for the first certificate but did not pass.
TBH I didn't give this much thought until I asked what school qualifications he actually has and read up some more. It seems that only 6 years is given by CIC for primary schooling? and I'm concerned that as both my boyfriends GCSE's and GNVQ are at the same academic level he won't be viewed as having 12 years of education even though back in the day his GNVQ could only be took at 6th form or college. GNVQ and GCSE'S are two completely different qualification's though I guess
Any thoughts would be really appreciated.
Its not like we're trying to get more points for skilled worker, we just need to prove 12 years of secondary education. If we document it sufficiently could we count first year primary?
Thanks
So i'm in a bit of a panic as I've only just realised that my other half might not meet the 12yr education requirements of the BC PNP. Can anyone give some advise please
My boyfriend has
Normal Uk schooling so 7 years at primary and 5 years at Secondary. He has GCSE'S (not good grades but has them)
As his GCSE'S where not too good he then went on to 6th form to study an intermediate GNVQ for 1 year which is the equivalent to 4 GCSE'S at A-C.
He then completed 1 year at tertiary college and left. He has a certificate for the first certificate but did not pass.
TBH I didn't give this much thought until I asked what school qualifications he actually has and read up some more. It seems that only 6 years is given by CIC for primary schooling? and I'm concerned that as both my boyfriends GCSE's and GNVQ are at the same academic level he won't be viewed as having 12 years of education even though back in the day his GNVQ could only be took at 6th form or college. GNVQ and GCSE'S are two completely different qualification's though I guess
Any thoughts would be really appreciated.
Its not like we're trying to get more points for skilled worker, we just need to prove 12 years of secondary education. If we document it sufficiently could we count first year primary?
Thanks
#2
Hi ya i no they dont count 6th form as part of your school years,but if your boyfriend can get a letter from the college to show his attendance then this will help to prove the 12 years required
hope this helps
hope this helps
#3
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 317











Hey Thanks
So his year at college would count towards formal education? I'm not bothered how cic classify it; secondary schooling or not. All i'm concerned with is proving he has 12 years of formal education
#6
Hi
Here is what the Federal Court has said in regards to education.
Even if it had been before the Officer, the extra year of A Level study would not be relevant to the assessment of education credentials. In Bhuiya v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 878, [2008] F.C.J. No. 1110, Justice Anne Mactavish explained that “the years of education requirement is clearly intended to establish minimum standards for each type of degree†and the fact that an applicant may have spent one additional year in school after obtaining their degree “does not turn a 16 year Master's degree into a 17 year Master's degreeâ€. That same logic applies here: the fact that the Applicant spent an extra year in school after obtaining her O Levels does not turn an 11-year diploma into a 12-year one.
Even if it had been before the Officer, the extra year of A Level study would not be relevant to the assessment of education credentials. In Bhuiya v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 878, [2008] F.C.J. No. 1110, Justice Anne Mactavish explained that “the years of education requirement is clearly intended to establish minimum standards for each type of degree†and the fact that an applicant may have spent one additional year in school after obtaining their degree “does not turn a 16 year Master's degree into a 17 year Master's degreeâ€. That same logic applies here: the fact that the Applicant spent an extra year in school after obtaining her O Levels does not turn an 11-year diploma into a 12-year one.
#7
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 317











Hi
Here is what the Federal Court has said in regards to education.
Even if it had been before the Officer, the extra year of A Level study would not be relevant to the assessment of education credentials. In Bhuiya v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 878, [2008] F.C.J. No. 1110, Justice Anne Mactavish explained that “the years of education requirement is clearly intended to establish minimum standards for each type of degree†and the fact that an applicant may have spent one additional year in school after obtaining their degree “does not turn a 16 year Master's degree into a 17 year Master's degreeâ€. That same logic applies here: the fact that the Applicant spent an extra year in school after obtaining her O Levels does not turn an 11-year diploma into a 12-year one.
Here is what the Federal Court has said in regards to education.
Even if it had been before the Officer, the extra year of A Level study would not be relevant to the assessment of education credentials. In Bhuiya v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 878, [2008] F.C.J. No. 1110, Justice Anne Mactavish explained that “the years of education requirement is clearly intended to establish minimum standards for each type of degree†and the fact that an applicant may have spent one additional year in school after obtaining their degree “does not turn a 16 year Master's degree into a 17 year Master's degreeâ€. That same logic applies here: the fact that the Applicant spent an extra year in school after obtaining her O Levels does not turn an 11-year diploma into a 12-year one.
His 2 qualifications are different though, It not that he repeated another year of GCSE'S but did a completely qualification . Does this make a difference? Just trying to exhaust all options before I tell him he's going back to school lol
#8
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 317











On another note if my boyfriend has 7 years at primary school as is normally the case in the UK are we OK to claim that so to speak if we document it?
I read that only 6 years is given for primary presumably as this is the norm in Canada (i think).
Thankyou
I read that only 6 years is given for primary presumably as this is the norm in Canada (i think).
Thankyou




