Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 7th 2012, 12:48 am   #16
md95065 Male
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,790

md95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: new twist to my problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by crg View Post
Of course, the charge may not have been a CIMT, but that gets very complicated with assault charges.
Indeed - while I am sure that we would all agree that whacking an irritating boyfriend with a bread knife doesn't come even close to "moral turpitude" and, in fact, might even have been exactly what he deserved, the law might not see it that way ...
md95065 is offline  

Old May 7th 2012, 2:30 am   #17
crg
American Expat
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,790

crg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: new twist to my problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by md95065 View Post
Indeed - while I am sure that we would all agree that whacking an irritating boyfriend with a bread knife doesn't come even close to "moral turpitude" and, in fact, might even have been exactly what he deserved, the law might not see it that way ...
Don't be so sure. These CIMT cases are complicated. I've heard of cases where someone was hit with a CIMT for whacking their kid with a shoe.
__________________
Don't take anything I post as legal advice, ever. My comments are for discussion purposes only.
crg is offline  
Old May 7th 2012, 2:58 am   #18
md95065 Male
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,790

md95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: new twist to my problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by crg View Post
Don't be so sure. These CIMT cases are complicated.
I think that you may possibly have missed the fact that my reply was not intended to be taken entirely seriously and that I did end it with the following disclaimer:

Quote:
Originally Posted by md95065 View Post
the law might not see it that way
md95065 is offline  
Old May 7th 2012, 6:09 am   #19
superkruz Male
Forum Regular
 
superkruz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 177

superkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: new twist to my problem

It is unfortunate how the law can have unintended results. I cannot imagine that it was the intention of lawmakers to stop people like OP and his wife getting visas.
__________________
Enter DV2010 : 2008
Interview : 2010
Green card : 2011
superkruz is offline  
Old May 7th 2012, 6:37 am   #20
md95065 Male
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,790

md95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: new twist to my problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by superkruz View Post
It is unfortunate how the law can have unintended results. I cannot imagine that it was the intention of lawmakers to stop people like OP and his wife getting visas.
Then I think that you misunderstand the fundamental intent of US immigration law...

It certainly was the intention of US lawmakers to keep out absolutely everyone except for those that met certain specific requirements.

Anyway it is likely that the OP's wife can get a visa - in fact she already has one - the discussion on this thread is about whether a particular incident in her past should have been disclosed and whether or not it is likely to be a problem.
md95065 is offline  
Old May 7th 2012, 6:45 am   #21
superkruz Male
Forum Regular
 
superkruz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 177

superkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond reputesuperkruz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: new twist to my problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by md95065 View Post
Then I think that you misunderstand the fundamental intent of US immigration law....
I think that you misunderstood my post.
__________________
Enter DV2010 : 2008
Interview : 2010
Green card : 2011
superkruz is offline  
Old May 7th 2012, 1:47 pm   #22
materialcontroller Male
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,055

materialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond reputematerialcontroller has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: new twist to my problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by crg View Post
I really don't see how someone who had to post bail can claim they weren't arrested. If they were not arrested, that means they were free to leave. Posting bail was required before the person could leave. That means they were not free to leave, and therefore were arrested/detained.

Of course, the charge may not have been a CIMT, but that gets very complicated with assault charges.
People don't necessarily have to "post" bail. They can be released on police bail while the police continue their inquiries. As to whether or not this means they were arrested, I don't honestly know. Perhaps it's possible to be interviewed and "cautioned" (ie. "read your rights") without being arrested. lansbury would know the answer. He is the law-enforcement expert of the forum.
materialcontroller is offline  
Old May 15th 2012, 10:10 pm   #23
daniel.thomas10
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 77

daniel.thomas10 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: new twist to my problem

wow thanks for all the repays guys. Im filling in a ACRO form to take down to the US embassy.
once we have that I am witting a letter to accompany it. (just stating it was a a accident) and fingers crossed she can have her visa reissued or revalidated... what ever they do after you have a visa and commit a 2nd offence
daniel.thomas10 is offline  
Closed Thread

 
  Subscribe to this Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

$ forumrules ***
Forum Jump


Top