Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
#31
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 439
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
Sounds like he has a strange mix of Left & Right policies?
Last edited by LoCarb; Nov 6th 2016 at 6:46 pm.
#32
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 0
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
I'm thinking of starting my own political party. It will be called The Hamster Party and I shall be it's glorious leader. Policies will include:
1) Allowing the importation of Syrian hamsters (we will look at the future importation of other hamster breeds as & when).
2) The world's first Hamster-themed fun park and resort.
3) Anyone heading to Australia must take a couple of possums (back) with them.
4) Still working on this one.
5) And this one!
Right, who's in?
1) Allowing the importation of Syrian hamsters (we will look at the future importation of other hamster breeds as & when).
2) The world's first Hamster-themed fun park and resort.
3) Anyone heading to Australia must take a couple of possums (back) with them.
4) Still working on this one.
5) And this one!
Right, who's in?
#33
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
I'm thinking of starting my own political party. It will be called The Hamster Party and I shall be it's glorious leader. Policies will include:
1) Allowing the importation of Syrian hamsters (we will look at the future importation of other hamster breeds as & when).
2) The world's first Hamster-themed fun park and resort.
3) Anyone heading to Australia must take a couple of possums (back) with them.
4) Still working on this one.
5) And this one!
Right, who's in?
1) Allowing the importation of Syrian hamsters (we will look at the future importation of other hamster breeds as & when).
2) The world's first Hamster-themed fun park and resort.
3) Anyone heading to Australia must take a couple of possums (back) with them.
4) Still working on this one.
5) And this one!
Right, who's in?
#34
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 0
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
#36
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 439
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
I like Labour's new policy on youth unemployment.
Halfway there to MMT's Job Guarantee.
Some sense at last
Halfway there to MMT's Job Guarantee.
Some sense at last
#37
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: permanently locked down
Posts: 733
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
Be interested if there's anything on state pension age, rather than Key's elephant in the room ignore it and 'not under my watch'.
It was Labour policy at the last two elections, but clearly unpopular (sometimes the truth hurts) and has simply been dropped.
So now both major parties ignoring the issue.
Instead ignoring it simply means it will need to be raised in the future with much much less notice, instead of giving people time to prepare.
Yes, some people aren't able to work past 65, and so should be on some other benefit instead. When the state pension at 65 was brought, most were living only 5 years longer.
In the UK for all Tony Blair's faults he did at least make some to address the issue, which is has been addressed in other European countries plus Australia, with NZ out of line.
Amplifying the issue is Key's government stopping payments to the super fund too, and creating artificial surpluses that will no doubt be spent on tax cuts next year.
#38
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 439
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
Flat rate tax and a capital gains tax have been rumoured. Neither would be a bad idea, if the former is it at an appropriate rate.
Be interested if there's anything on state pension age, rather than Key's elephant in the room ignore it and 'not under my watch'.
It was Labour policy at the last two elections, but clearly unpopular (sometimes the truth hurts) and has simply been dropped.
So now both major parties ignoring the issue.
Instead ignoring it simply means it will need to be raised in the future with much much less notice, instead of giving people time to prepare.
Yes, some people aren't able to work past 65, and so should be on some other benefit instead. When the state pension at 65 was brought, most were living only 5 years longer.
In the UK for all Tony Blair's faults he did at least make some to address the issue, which is has been addressed in other European countries plus Australia, with NZ out of line.
Amplifying the issue is Key's government stopping payments to the super fund too, and creating artificial surpluses that will no doubt be spent on tax cuts next year.
Be interested if there's anything on state pension age, rather than Key's elephant in the room ignore it and 'not under my watch'.
It was Labour policy at the last two elections, but clearly unpopular (sometimes the truth hurts) and has simply been dropped.
So now both major parties ignoring the issue.
Instead ignoring it simply means it will need to be raised in the future with much much less notice, instead of giving people time to prepare.
Yes, some people aren't able to work past 65, and so should be on some other benefit instead. When the state pension at 65 was brought, most were living only 5 years longer.
In the UK for all Tony Blair's faults he did at least make some to address the issue, which is has been addressed in other European countries plus Australia, with NZ out of line.
Amplifying the issue is Key's government stopping payments to the super fund too, and creating artificial surpluses that will no doubt be spent on tax cuts next year.
Flat tax:
Think this through.... if total tax take is to remain the same, a flat tax means the poor will pay more tax and the wealthy will pay less. How do you justify that?
Pensions:
The government issues the currency, so it is never financially constrained, only resource constrained.
The only restriction on future pension payments is whether or not there are enough resources in the country the government can purchase for the care of the elderly, e.g. are there enough doctors, nurses, rest homes, zimmer frames, incontinence pads etc.
It's never a question of money. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) clearly explains this.
If the resourses are available, the government can purchase them.
So what we need to do is not save money, but make sure we are training sufficient workers to care for the elderly in the future and build the infrastructure that will be needed.
#39
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
At the moment the wealthy don't actually pay tax, they avoid it as they consider it grossly unfair, which of course it is. The object of the flat tax is to encourage the wealthy to pay tax.
#42
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
The poor old working class shouldn't have to pay tax up to a certain rate on their labour. I'd vote for that.
#43
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
Interesting statement - given the last UK figure I saw quoted was the top 1% of income earners paid 40% of the total income tax take, but if it is correct the bottom 50% paid no tax (net) it leaves me in the squeezed middle.
#44
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 439
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
No personal allowance in NZ so the poor pay their share of income tax + 15% GST.
Richard Murphy's take on flat tax:
Tax Research UK ยป Flat taxes and the desire to increase inequality
#45
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: permanently locked down
Posts: 733
Re: Would you support Gareth Morgan's new Political party
Flat tax:
Think this through.... if total tax take is to remain the same, a flat tax means the poor will pay more tax and the wealthy will pay less. How do you justify that?
Pensions:
The government issues the currency, so it is never financially constrained, only resource constrained.
The only restriction on future pension payments is whether or not there are enough resources in the country the government can purchase for the care of the elderly, e.g. are there enough doctors, nurses, rest homes, zimmer frames, incontinence pads etc.
It's never a question of money. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) clearly explains this.
If the resourses are available, the government can purchase them.
So what we need to do is not save money, but make sure we are training sufficient workers to care for the elderly in the future and build the infrastructure that will be needed.
Think this through.... if total tax take is to remain the same, a flat tax means the poor will pay more tax and the wealthy will pay less. How do you justify that?
Pensions:
The government issues the currency, so it is never financially constrained, only resource constrained.
The only restriction on future pension payments is whether or not there are enough resources in the country the government can purchase for the care of the elderly, e.g. are there enough doctors, nurses, rest homes, zimmer frames, incontinence pads etc.
It's never a question of money. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) clearly explains this.
If the resourses are available, the government can purchase them.
So what we need to do is not save money, but make sure we are training sufficient workers to care for the elderly in the future and build the infrastructure that will be needed.
Likewise a capital gains tax, again fair.
Pensions - sorry I don't see your point. 'The government issues the currency, so it is never financially constrained, only resource constrained', you suggesting when we can't afford to pay the increased cost of pensions because we're not providing for things now or warning people in advance that the state retirement age will be going up in a staged manner (like most other reasonable countries have done), instead we simply issue more money later, that's simply going to create inflation, no such thing as free money, unless your numbers have come up in tonight's lottery.