small island politics
#76
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 198
Re: small island politics
A few thoughts on the election as the polling booths open
The polls say a Tory win and but it certainly won't be the landslide predicted when they called this election.
May's authority to lead both the party and the country is in tatters. Her campaign has consisted of poor platitudes and spin fronted by someone too inept to carry it off. "Fields of wheat" and strong and stable in her final address are signs off a press office hanging her out to dry.
They'll let her open for Brexit but a short list for top order will have been drawn up weeks ago now. Larry the cat has more chance than Boris of being on it.
Against quite insurmountable opposition Corbyn has played a blinder of a campaign. Forget the Tories and The Sun (though the depths they sunk to yesterday was a new low) he's had to overcome Labour party activists smearing and campaigning against him right up to today.
He'll probably never be PM but I don't think that was ever the point. What he has done is reignite a large section of the population and shown that another form of politics is viable. This social populism is also the perfect anecdote to Crosby's 10x budget and social media processes. For every paid Facebook post they buy, there's a free like and share to counter.
It's very early days but the seeds of his "new kind of politics" may have been sewn.
The SNP have probably played the best tactical campaign of the election and quite deftly maneuvered themselves into a win/win, long term situation.
Buy completely isolating Scottish Labour, who've been licking their wounds for years, they've turned Scotland into the ideal two horse race. They've done all they can with their stint in Westminster and if Ruth's Conservatives take a few seats off them, then all the better.
It's a tad playing with fire but 6 to 8 Scottish Tories, a Conservative govt and Brexit is as good an environment as they're ever going to get for launching the independence referendum they already have a mandate on. Ironically, it's Corbyn's Labour that is the biggest threat to the SNP which is why they've done everything they can to turn it into Scotland v the Tories, Us v Them.
If somehow Labour do sneak it today then it's going to be a coalition government and they get to play Scotland's custodians with populist policies for another four years and get much needed exposure to international affairs, without the liability that learning on the job post-indy would bring.
I voted Green btw
The polls say a Tory win and but it certainly won't be the landslide predicted when they called this election.
May's authority to lead both the party and the country is in tatters. Her campaign has consisted of poor platitudes and spin fronted by someone too inept to carry it off. "Fields of wheat" and strong and stable in her final address are signs off a press office hanging her out to dry.
They'll let her open for Brexit but a short list for top order will have been drawn up weeks ago now. Larry the cat has more chance than Boris of being on it.
Against quite insurmountable opposition Corbyn has played a blinder of a campaign. Forget the Tories and The Sun (though the depths they sunk to yesterday was a new low) he's had to overcome Labour party activists smearing and campaigning against him right up to today.
He'll probably never be PM but I don't think that was ever the point. What he has done is reignite a large section of the population and shown that another form of politics is viable. This social populism is also the perfect anecdote to Crosby's 10x budget and social media processes. For every paid Facebook post they buy, there's a free like and share to counter.
It's very early days but the seeds of his "new kind of politics" may have been sewn.
The SNP have probably played the best tactical campaign of the election and quite deftly maneuvered themselves into a win/win, long term situation.
Buy completely isolating Scottish Labour, who've been licking their wounds for years, they've turned Scotland into the ideal two horse race. They've done all they can with their stint in Westminster and if Ruth's Conservatives take a few seats off them, then all the better.
It's a tad playing with fire but 6 to 8 Scottish Tories, a Conservative govt and Brexit is as good an environment as they're ever going to get for launching the independence referendum they already have a mandate on. Ironically, it's Corbyn's Labour that is the biggest threat to the SNP which is why they've done everything they can to turn it into Scotland v the Tories, Us v Them.
If somehow Labour do sneak it today then it's going to be a coalition government and they get to play Scotland's custodians with populist policies for another four years and get much needed exposure to international affairs, without the liability that learning on the job post-indy would bring.
I voted Green btw
#77
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: small island politics
This fields of wheat thing, it was very cringe and all that....but the response makes me chuckle. Do people want some reprobate who was smoking at 11 and burning cars on the street by 15? ****ing morons.
#78
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 198
Re: small island politics
"Loosing a dossier on top flight child abuse"
My point is that question would have been submitted in advance and work shopped prior to that interview. The answer probably did come from her but the fact her team let her go through with it, says a few things.
#79
Re: small island politics
"What was the naughtiest thing you ever done?"
"Loosing a dossier on top flight child abuse"
My point is that question would have been submitted in advance and work shopped prior to that interview. The answer probably did come from her but the fact her team let her go through with it, says a few things.
"Loosing a dossier on top flight child abuse"
My point is that question would have been submitted in advance and work shopped prior to that interview. The answer probably did come from her but the fact her team let her go through with it, says a few things.
#81
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 198
Re: small island politics
Theresa May was asked in a fluff piece what the naughtiest thing she ever did was. Her answer of "running through fields of wheat and annoying the farmer" suggests a level of disconnect with the populace and, arguably, a lack of personality.
#82
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: small island politics
If more naughty = good then let's find someone in prison or someone who was a total bellend as a kid be PM.
#83
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,520
Re: small island politics
A highly controversial maverick with minimal or no real political or policy experience bursts upon the scene, capitalizing on a deep seated desire, anger, and selfishness among a segment of the voters who see themselves as overlooked and ignored by the majority and seeking revenge against the establishment and their inability to respond to their particular cares. The maverick does tap into a legitimate frustration and prides himself on speaking the plain truth and packs the auditoriums who give him rousing cheers every time he promises the sky and heavens and that he’d enact wide ranging, radical reforms overturning years, even decades of policies (but despite that these uncosted policies so would badly affect the economy, which would most negatively affect his own voting base).
The maverick quickly builds up a loyal following who conveniently overlook or ignore or justify his highly controversial past and provocative history. The maverick is also surrounded by a tightly knit circle of loyal advisors who have even more controversial history on the far extremes of political radicalism including openly supporting heavily discredited ideologies that have demonstrated to be disastrous, both economically and in human costs.
But all this is ignored by a voter base who project on this maverick their own dreams and angers as they forget what’s personal is not the same as important.
Am I talking about Donald Trump? Or Jeremy Corbyn?
The maverick quickly builds up a loyal following who conveniently overlook or ignore or justify his highly controversial past and provocative history. The maverick is also surrounded by a tightly knit circle of loyal advisors who have even more controversial history on the far extremes of political radicalism including openly supporting heavily discredited ideologies that have demonstrated to be disastrous, both economically and in human costs.
But all this is ignored by a voter base who project on this maverick their own dreams and angers as they forget what’s personal is not the same as important.
Am I talking about Donald Trump? Or Jeremy Corbyn?
Last edited by DXBtoDOH; Jun 8th 2017 at 8:08 am.
#84
Re: small island politics
A highly controversial maverick with minimal or no real political or policy experience bursts upon the scene, capitalizing on a deep seated desire, anger, and selfishness among a segment of the voters who see themselves as overlooked and ignored by the majority and seeking revenge against the establishment and their inability to respond to their particular cares. The maverick does tap into a legitimate frustration and prides himself on speaking the plain truth and packs the auditoriums who give him rousing cheers every time he promises the sky and heavens and that he’d enact wide ranging, radical reforms overturning years, even decades of policies (but despite that these uncosted policies so would badly affect the economy, which would most negatively affect his own voting base).
The maverick quickly builds up a loyal following who conveniently overlook or ignore or justify his highly controversial past and provocative history. The maverick is also surrounded by a tightly knit circle of loyal advisors who have even more controversial history on the far extremes of political radicalism including openly supporting heavily discredited ideologies that have demonstrated to be disastrous, both economically and in human costs.
But all this is ignored by a voter base who project on this maverick their own dreams and angers as they forget what’s personal is not the same as important.
Am I talking about Donald Trump? Or Jeremy Corbyn?
The maverick quickly builds up a loyal following who conveniently overlook or ignore or justify his highly controversial past and provocative history. The maverick is also surrounded by a tightly knit circle of loyal advisors who have even more controversial history on the far extremes of political radicalism including openly supporting heavily discredited ideologies that have demonstrated to be disastrous, both economically and in human costs.
But all this is ignored by a voter base who project on this maverick their own dreams and angers as they forget what’s personal is not the same as important.
Am I talking about Donald Trump? Or Jeremy Corbyn?
#85
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 198
Re: small island politics
If Mummy had spin like that, she'd still be 20 pts ahead today
#87
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi by body and Sydney by soul
Posts: 1,841
Re: small island politics
I would find some perverse pleasure in seeing Trump and Corbyn though. Imagine the headaches for the mandarins.
#89
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: small island politics
Surprises come in 3's:
Brexit
Trump
Corbyn
That is, of course, only if shit and surprises do come in 3's....
#90
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,520
Re: small island politics
Anyone want to make final predictions on today's outcome? Vote breakdown by %? Size of majority?
Or are we too scared?
Or are we too scared?