Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > Marriage Based Visas
Reload this Page >

Citizenship Interview question

Citizenship Interview question

Old Dec 21st 2017, 6:31 pm
  #1  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 47
Lil_Didi is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Citizenship Interview question

Hi guys,

Hoping I can get a bit of assistance as my Lawyer has been a bit vague with advice.

I received my permanent residence based on my marriage to a US citizen.
We married in 2009 and lived together between 2009 and 2013.
I got my permanent residence in 2010.

We haven't lived together for a few years but are still on good terms and have shared bank accounts, file taxes together and have shared health insurance.

My interview for Citizenship is Jan 3rd.
I am going to try and bring us much of the items I had originally presented for permanent residence but I don't have everything- such as our old shared utility bills etc and a report of health insurance from each year. Is that ok? Am I supposed to have all evidence from before?


If asked if we are still married I plan on being honest and saying yes. If asked if we are living together I plan on saying we have been separated. I'm currently staying with him temporarily but we have lived separately for a few years.
Will this cause any problems for getting my citizenship?
I have paid taxes, only taken short trips outside the US and been employed in New York this entire time.

Also, one of the requirements is a state issued ID but I don't have one. Is that ok? I will just be bringing my Green card and British passport.

Appreciate your advice.
Lil_Didi is offline  
Old Dec 21st 2017, 7:32 pm
  #2  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,679
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

You are eligible for citizenship based on being a PR for 5 years, so your marital status or proof of such is not relevant. Of course be honest, but your marriage situation will not hinder your chances of becoming a USC.

As for state issued ID, you can't provide what you don't have, so yes, bring your other IDs.

Rene
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Dec 21st 2017, 10:40 pm
  #3  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,382
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

On what basis did you petition for US naturalization. You are long pass the 3 year mark for the filing because you are in a marriage to a USC for three years and also well passed the 5 year mark of PR status. So why would you bring items from your permanent resident interview? Yes, bring your marriage certificate and separation paperwork if you are legally separated. If you are, then in NYS once you are legally separated for one year the divorce can be finalized. You need to bring the last 5 years of US tax returns to prove that you have "good character". I'm surprised that you don't have a state driver's license but then again, if you live in the borough of Manhattan or the Bronx, Staten Island, etc. you have good mass transportation and don't require a driver's license as you don't require a car.

Curious that you don't mention that you had to file for removal of conditions in 2011/2012. If you were only married in 2009 and became a PR in 2010, then you were a conditional permanent resident not a permanent resident.

This has been amended because I'm an idiot and skipped a paragraph. Sorry for that.

Last edited by Rete; Dec 22nd 2017 at 12:00 am.
Rete is offline  
Old Dec 21st 2017, 11:20 pm
  #4  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,679
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

I didn't see where the OP said she is divorced. In fact, she said she would be honest at the interview by saying they are still married.

Rene

Last edited by Noorah101; Dec 21st 2017 at 11:23 pm.
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Dec 21st 2017, 11:53 pm
  #5  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,382
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Originally Posted by Noorah101
I didn't see where the OP said she is divorced. In fact, she said she would be honest at the interview by saying they are still married.

Rene
She wrote:

"We haven't lived together for a few years but are still on good terms and have shared bank accounts, file taxes together and have shared health insurance." Didn't read the part where she said they are separated. Wonder if they are legally separated or just living apart. for the last 4 years.

Strange.

Last edited by Rete; Dec 22nd 2017 at 12:00 am.
Rete is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 11:52 am
  #6  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 2,133
MidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

As per Rete in #3 the crucial issue is on what basis the OP petitioned for naturalization. If on the basis of marriage, which is what she implies from all her emphasis on marriage, I think she is doomed. If on the basis of five year permanent residence she should be fine, provided she produces the correct supporting paperwork.
MidAtlantic is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 12:15 pm
  #7  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,679
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Even if based on marriage, I don't think she's doomed. They ate still legally married and share finances. They just don't live in the same house.

It will be interesting to see how it goes.

Rene
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 12:35 pm
  #8  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 2,133
MidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Originally Posted by Noorah101
Even if based on marriage, I don't think she's doomed. They ate still legally married and share finances. They just don't live in the same house.

It will be interesting to see how it goes.

Rene
Maybe I was too dogmatic, but I think it is unlikely that they will be deemed to be "living in marital union" as per the attached.

https://www.uscis.gov/policymanual/H...-Chapter2.html

Additionally, why apply on the basis of marriage, which is questionable, when she can apply on the basis of five years permanent residence?

Last edited by MidAtlantic; Dec 22nd 2017 at 12:37 pm.
MidAtlantic is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 12:49 pm
  #9  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,679
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Originally Posted by MidAtlantic

Additionally, why apply on the basis of marriage, which is questionable, when she can apply on the basis of five years permanent residence?
On this I agree. In 2015 she was eligible to file based on 5 years as a PR. That is what she should have done.

I have heard that USCIS wants people to become USCs so hopefully they will overlook the fact that they aren't living in the same household.

When my alien spouse became a USC, we were spending most of our time apart, but our joint residence was in Arizona together. He was just spending most of his time in California due to work, and we could prove that (although the subject never came up).

The OP doesn't say why they have separate residences.

Rene
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 1:54 pm
  #10  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,382
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Honestly can't see that it will be problematic. When at the interview, the examiner can red pencil the application and make it for the 5 year rule instead of the 3 year married rule. They do want you to naturalize so if she is eligible under the 5 year rule, I can see them red penciling the app and letting it through that way. Probably have already done just that without her even realizing it.
Rete is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 3:09 pm
  #11  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,679
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Originally Posted by Rete
Honestly can't see that it will be problematic. When at the interview, the examiner can red pencil the application and make it for the 5 year rule instead of the 3 year married rule. They do want you to naturalize so if she is eligible under the 5 year rule, I can see them red penciling the app and letting it through that way. Probably have already done just that without her even realizing it.
I agree.

Rene
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 8:53 pm
  #12  
BE Irregular
 
RICH's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Tampa Bay Florida
Posts: 4,849
RICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Based on my experience - K1 visa 2004, divorced 2009, citizenship 2013:

Even if you checked the box for 3 year marriage based - it does not change the fact you are eligible under 5 years rule.

I applied under 5 year rule but still had to provide the divorce cert. They want a record of any changed circumstances, even if irrelevant to eligibility. If, there is a legal separation you should provide that documentation.

You do not have to provide the "evidence" previously provided for GC/AOS etc - they already have that. In fact a thick file was on the table at my interview presumably containing "everything".

I don't think State ID is a requirement. Govt issued Id ie your GC should cover getting you in the building.
RICH is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 11:11 pm
  #13  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,382
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

Well, she's not been back, but apparently they are not divorced but separated. But good to have your feedback.
Rete is offline  
Old Dec 22nd 2017, 11:59 pm
  #14  
BE Irregular
 
RICH's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Tampa Bay Florida
Posts: 4,849
RICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Citizenship Interview question

You're welcome.
RICH is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.