White privilege???
#16
#17
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: White privilege???
If all it took was hard work, I should be wealthy..lol
This thread reminds of the idiots on LinkedIn who plump up on the white privilege threads saying that "you have to play your hand" and "I got where I did through hard work".
Candidly just so everyone is clear there is no such thing as a self made person and anyone who tells you other wise is kidding themselves.
Candidly just so everyone is clear there is no such thing as a self made person and anyone who tells you other wise is kidding themselves.
#18
Re: White privilege???
Your life is the product of the hand outs you've received.
Someone is now going to try and write me a lengthy sonnet of how this is not true.
#21
Re: White privilege???
This thread reminds of the idiots on LinkedIn who plump up on the white privilege threads saying that "you have to play your hand" and "I got where I did through hard work".
Candidly just so everyone is clear there is no such thing as a self made person and anyone who tells you other wise is kidding themselves.
Candidly just so everyone is clear there is no such thing as a self made person and anyone who tells you other wise is kidding themselves.
Not everyone born into poverty remains there; not everyone born into affluence remains there either.
Assuming that one's life is going to be whatever it is going to be and that it cannot be changed is, IMVHO, a huge waste of one's potential.
Whatever "handouts" one receives, one's decisions will still affect the outcome.
#22
Re: White privilege???
I'll bite.
Not everyone born into poverty remains there; not everyone born into affluence remains there either.
Assuming that one's life is going to be whatever it is going to be and that it cannot be changed is, IMVHO, a huge waste of one's potential.
Whatever "handouts" one receives, one's decisions will still affect the outcome.
Not everyone born into poverty remains there; not everyone born into affluence remains there either.
Assuming that one's life is going to be whatever it is going to be and that it cannot be changed is, IMVHO, a huge waste of one's potential.
Whatever "handouts" one receives, one's decisions will still affect the outcome.
#23
Re: White privilege???
I don't doubt that some people have more opportunities than others and if people wish to believe that they are unable to achieve what they wish to achieve purely as a result that others have more opportunities than they do, that is fine, but that has not been my experience.
I refuse to accept that successful people (however that is defined) are there purely as a result of "handouts" and that the choices they have made have had no effect upon the outcome.
I would never choose to limit myself by a belief that being born into a poor family, or having a disability, was going to dictate what I was going to be able to achieve.
I firmly believe that one's attitude to whatever happens is far more important than the opportunity one is presented with.
Last edited by Almost Canadian; Mar 10th 2018 at 3:29 pm.
#24
Re: White privilege???
I don't doubt that some people have more opportunities than others and if people wish to believe that they are unable to achieve what they wish to achieve purely as a result that others have more opportunities than they do, that is fine, but that has not been my experience.
#25
Re: White privilege???
I haven't called anyone a slacker nor have I denied that some people face more hurdles than others.
What I am saying is that not all "successful people" (in any sphere, be it musicians, sports people, academics, business, etc.) are successful simply because of opportunities they are presented with in much the same way that not all of those presented with opportunities go on to be "successful".
I believe that how one deals with opportunities presented, or lack thereof, is far more important.
#26
Re: White privilege???
In that comic strip, I would be Paula.
I haven't called anyone a slacker nor have I denied that some people face more hurdles than others.
What I am saying is that not all "successful people" (in any sphere, be it musicians, sports people, academics, business, etc.) are successful simply because of opportunities they are presented with in much the same way that not all of those presented with opportunities go on to be "successful".
I believe that how one deals with opportunities presented, or lack thereof, is far more important.
I haven't called anyone a slacker nor have I denied that some people face more hurdles than others.
What I am saying is that not all "successful people" (in any sphere, be it musicians, sports people, academics, business, etc.) are successful simply because of opportunities they are presented with in much the same way that not all of those presented with opportunities go on to be "successful".
I believe that how one deals with opportunities presented, or lack thereof, is far more important.
#27
Re: White privilege???
What I am saying is that not all "successful people" (in any sphere, be it musicians, sports people, academics, business, etc.) are successful simply because of opportunities they are presented with in much the same way that not all of those presented with opportunities go on to be "successful".
I think James' original point may have been that there are many who have succeeded that don't recognize (or appreciate) the advantages they were afforded. Probably true. This is a post about privilege so it seems a valid observation for him to make. Not sure why you always have such difficulty in with this idea.
#28
Re: White privilege???
In that comic strip, I would be Paula.
I haven't called anyone a slacker nor have I denied that some people face more hurdles than others.
What I am saying is that not all "successful people" (in any sphere, be it musicians, sports people, academics, business, etc.) are successful simply because of opportunities they are presented with in much the same way that not all of those presented with opportunities go on to be "successful".
I believe that how one deals with opportunities presented, or lack thereof, is far more important.
I haven't called anyone a slacker nor have I denied that some people face more hurdles than others.
What I am saying is that not all "successful people" (in any sphere, be it musicians, sports people, academics, business, etc.) are successful simply because of opportunities they are presented with in much the same way that not all of those presented with opportunities go on to be "successful".
I believe that how one deals with opportunities presented, or lack thereof, is far more important.
Your argument fits into the you play the cards you are dealt scenario. Some people do take more risks than others and some read situations better. I can't dispute that. I hate authority and it has hurt me in the work place a few times.
The cartoon Bristol posted I don't think goes far enough to highlight the extremes of "white" privilege. It really just touches on the difference between white upper and middle class in my opinion.
But, and there are always exceptions, I suspect none of us have had to over come any sociocultural divide which is where you need to go to truly understand "white" privilege. Then you really can start to look at the opportunities and "lack there of".
Last edited by JamesM; Mar 10th 2018 at 7:21 pm.
#29
Re: White privilege???
AC, you've a remarkable and admirable life story. But think back to your primary school class. Out of those 30 kids, how many do you think might have matched or exceeded your success? Is there a common, or repeatable, factor? If it is just down to luck or individual ability, then it doesn't really add value to suggest to other people that they can just do the same as you.
In my opinion, privilege can buy reward. Ability can earn reward. It is quite wrong, however, to suggest that people of ability from poor/uneducated backgrounds can simply "apply themselves" and achieve success, because often they have no idea about what that even means. It's like saying, no bread? Well let them eat cake!
In my opinion, privilege can buy reward. Ability can earn reward. It is quite wrong, however, to suggest that people of ability from poor/uneducated backgrounds can simply "apply themselves" and achieve success, because often they have no idea about what that even means. It's like saying, no bread? Well let them eat cake!
#30
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: White privilege???
To be honest I have no real idea what apply yourself means.
I went to school everyday from K to 12, I didn't do well, I struggled, barely passed, but I did spend everyday after school struggling through my work, every weekend doing the same. My doing poor in school was certainly not due to lack of effort on my part.
I didn't party, slack off, I probably spent more time on my school work then many of the smart successful classmates.
Some I suppose would say I didn't apply myself, I don't agree as I did the very best that I was capable of doing with what I had available to me.
I went to school everyday from K to 12, I didn't do well, I struggled, barely passed, but I did spend everyday after school struggling through my work, every weekend doing the same. My doing poor in school was certainly not due to lack of effort on my part.
I didn't party, slack off, I probably spent more time on my school work then many of the smart successful classmates.
Some I suppose would say I didn't apply myself, I don't agree as I did the very best that I was capable of doing with what I had available to me.