They're still at it
#1
They're still at it
Anyone remember the 90s with Group 4 getting the contract for transporting prisoners to court and letting a bunch of them escape within a few days? And then doing it again. How we all laughed.
They're still at it, except now they're called G4S and their inefficiencies have expanded with their work.
G4S staff suspended from Brook House immigration centre over abuse claims
On the same page are other recent stories about G4S.
Ofsted rules jail inadequate; High levels of violence at child jail; Fined 100 times for breaching prison contracts...
And still the government uses them.
Acccording to wiki they've been surrounded in controversy countless times. Managers getting bonuses when investigation after investigation reveals them to be poorlyy run and all the rest of it.
Actually, they are probably run very well if the purpose is to fleece the government for as much money as you can, while providing sub-standard work in return, thus increasing the profit margins for a few and then winning another contract and doing the same thing over and over...
G4s and A4e must be in competition with each other as to which one is the biggest disgrace.
They're still at it, except now they're called G4S and their inefficiencies have expanded with their work.
G4S staff suspended from Brook House immigration centre over abuse claims
Footage is said to show officers mocking and assaulting detainees at centre near Gatwick
Ofsted rules jail inadequate; High levels of violence at child jail; Fined 100 times for breaching prison contracts...
And still the government uses them.
Acccording to wiki they've been surrounded in controversy countless times. Managers getting bonuses when investigation after investigation reveals them to be poorlyy run and all the rest of it.
Actually, they are probably run very well if the purpose is to fleece the government for as much money as you can, while providing sub-standard work in return, thus increasing the profit margins for a few and then winning another contract and doing the same thing over and over...
G4s and A4e must be in competition with each other as to which one is the biggest disgrace.
#2
Re: They're still at it
I think they also messed up the Olympics staffing? Have never understood why UK governments continually rely on them.
#3
Re: They're still at it
Anyone remember the 90s with Group 4 getting the contract for transporting prisoners to court and letting a bunch of them escape within a few days? And then doing it again. How we all laughed.
They're still at it, except now they're called G4S and their inefficiencies have expanded with their work.
G4S staff suspended from Brook House immigration centre over abuse claims
On the same page are other recent stories about G4S.
Ofsted rules jail inadequate; High levels of violence at child jail; Fined 100 times for breaching prison contracts...
And still the government uses them.
Acccording to wiki they've been surrounded in controversy countless times. Managers getting bonuses when investigation after investigation reveals them to be poorlyy run and all the rest of it.
Actually, they are probably run very well if the purpose is to fleece the government for as much money as you can, while providing sub-standard work in return, thus increasing the profit margins for a few and then winning another contract and doing the same thing over and over...
G4s and A4e must be in competition with each other as to which one is the biggest disgrace.
They're still at it, except now they're called G4S and their inefficiencies have expanded with their work.
G4S staff suspended from Brook House immigration centre over abuse claims
On the same page are other recent stories about G4S.
Ofsted rules jail inadequate; High levels of violence at child jail; Fined 100 times for breaching prison contracts...
And still the government uses them.
Acccording to wiki they've been surrounded in controversy countless times. Managers getting bonuses when investigation after investigation reveals them to be poorlyy run and all the rest of it.
Actually, they are probably run very well if the purpose is to fleece the government for as much money as you can, while providing sub-standard work in return, thus increasing the profit margins for a few and then winning another contract and doing the same thing over and over...
G4s and A4e must be in competition with each other as to which one is the biggest disgrace.
I suggest you have a look at HM Prisons Inspectorate reports and then decide whether private, or public, prisons come out on top.
#4
Re: They're still at it
Not wishing to sound like Trump in saying there will be faults on both sides. But I have no doubt that problems on the government side are likely to relate to underfunding (something I quickly noticed in some of those reports) while those on the private side will likely result from a similar underfunding - or maybe under cutting would be more accurate - because such corner cutting wins them the contracts in the first place. They appear to offer a cheaper alternative because they don't do it properly.
I'm fairly sure that that Public managers don't pay themselves bonuses despite reports criticising them. They don't control pay levels!
You might also note that I included A4e the controversial training agency with it's bogus training courses that don't actually happen and such like. I can state with some certainty that before training was privatised, no bogus courses were held since there was no money to be obtained under false pretenses.
Here are some details I came across earlier of G4S practices.
In May 2016, the Independent Police Complaints Commission conducted an investigation into the practises of G4S working with Lincolnshire Police after five 999 control room staff for the police force were suspended amid claims workers made emergency calls at "quiet times" in a bid to improve call answering data. Disciplinary procedures were undertaken against the accused in accordance with company policy, and police said the staff involved are all former Lincolnshire Police employees who transferred to G4S four years ago
In 2014 G4S repaid money it had been paid for tagging offenders in Scotland. G4S had charged the government for tagging offenders who were dead or in prison
This is not as simple as wondering whether private prisons are better or worse than public ones, this is scandalous behaviour from G4S no matter what they turn their grubby hands to.
#5
Re: They're still at it
That's rather a lot to plough through. I couldn't help but notice the high number of private contractors involved.
Not wishing to sound like Trump in saying there will be faults on both sides. But I have no doubt that problems on the government side are likely to relate to underfunding (something I quickly noticed in some of those reports) while those on the private side will likely result from a similar underfunding - or maybe under cutting would be more accurate - because such corner cutting wins them the contracts in the first place. They appear to offer a cheaper alternative because they don't do it properly.
I'm fairly sure that that Public managers don't pay themselves bonuses despite reports criticising them. They don't control pay levels!
You might also note that I included A4e the controversial training agency with it's bogus training courses that don't actually happen and such like. I can state with some certainty that before training was privatised, no bogus courses were held since there was no money to be obtained under false pretenses.
Here are some details I came across earlier of G4S practices.
And then there's
There are loads of examples of things like this with private providers doing what used to be done in house.
This is not as simple as wondering whether private prisons are better or worse than public ones, this is scandalous behaviour from G4S no matter what they turn their grubby hands to.
Not wishing to sound like Trump in saying there will be faults on both sides. But I have no doubt that problems on the government side are likely to relate to underfunding (something I quickly noticed in some of those reports) while those on the private side will likely result from a similar underfunding - or maybe under cutting would be more accurate - because such corner cutting wins them the contracts in the first place. They appear to offer a cheaper alternative because they don't do it properly.
I'm fairly sure that that Public managers don't pay themselves bonuses despite reports criticising them. They don't control pay levels!
You might also note that I included A4e the controversial training agency with it's bogus training courses that don't actually happen and such like. I can state with some certainty that before training was privatised, no bogus courses were held since there was no money to be obtained under false pretenses.
Here are some details I came across earlier of G4S practices.
And then there's
There are loads of examples of things like this with private providers doing what used to be done in house.
This is not as simple as wondering whether private prisons are better or worse than public ones, this is scandalous behaviour from G4S no matter what they turn their grubby hands to.
The difference between the two is that, if the government doesn’t want to, the private sector’s contract will not be renewed, or they can be sued for breach of contract. That doesn’t happen in the public sector.
#6
Re: They're still at it
You may not remember but we had a similar debate a few years ago concerning the 18 training providers the government was using. Not one of them had met their contracted targets. Did they lose their contracts or suffer penalties? Not at the time, no.
I did a bit of googling to see if anything happened after but it's too time consuming.
Funnily enough, while looking, I discovered that A4e had pulled out of a contract for training/education in prisons because they weren't making the profit they hoped.
Second time they did that apparently. Just scrap their agreement. With no comeback. Yet they still get contracts. It stinks, quite honestly.
I'm going to stop thinking about it. It's just making me angry.
#7
Re: They're still at it
Precisely this. Although I advocate free markets, I recognise that there can be market failures, and the monopolistic nature of G4S is a good example. At least when a government department is failing, politicians can be held to account and pressured to make improvements. When it's outsourced, there's a kind of stalemate as the politicians say, we put it tender, this was the best option as chosen by an independent apolitical panel, what can we do. Next stop, NHS, if we're not careful.
#8
Re: They're still at it
I've had to make adjustments. Moral/Political ones I mean. We have an equivalent to the NHS but only as far as hospital discharge. Then you're on your own with the cost of equipment/treatment/prescriptions. Even crutches to be paid for.
Taxes pay for education but at the beginning of every school year you get a school supplies list that might come to $50 or $60 per child. So you're supplying paper, folders, scissors and all the rest of it rather than the school.
Free school meals.
Certain employee rights.
Just some of a ton of examples that are different here but that would be taken for granted in the UK.
And because those things in the UK never existed here, nobody misses them or even thinks it could be possible.
I, like much of the UK, would have been out marching if there was a sniff of anything like that happening over there.
But here, I just have to accept that it's the norm for Canada.
So here's what puzzles me:
The gov of NB has just taken responsibility for Extra Mural and tele-care from the two health authorities and given it to an outside organisation (the head of whom is a former Premier of NB, but I'm sure that's just coincidence).
The weird thing is it's apparently not going to save any money and might actually cost more with up front costs. (er, so why do it?)
It seems there are to be a series of targets to be met, with bonuses. (but nothing about penalties for failing?)
It's all a bit odd and rather sounds as if it might actually cost more if the bonuses come into play. But if they do it better then perhaps it's worth it.
But the real puzzle is that in a country where this is traditionally more widespread than in the UK, everyone connected to the change is denying it's privatisation.
Why would they want to deny that? The responsibility for hospital catering has just gone to an outside company but they were all okay with that being called for what it is.
Last edited by BristolUK; Sep 2nd 2017 at 4:08 pm. Reason: light fingers not resulting in letters where they should be.
#9
Re: They're still at it
So here's what puzzles me:
The gov of NB has just taken responsibility for Extra Mural and tele-care from the two health authorities and given it to an outside organisation (the head of whom is a former Premier of NB, but I'm sure that's just coincidence).
The weird thing is it's apparently not going to save any money and might actually cost more with up front costs. (er, so why do it?)
It seems there are to be a series of targets to be met, with bonuses. (but nothing about penalties for failing?)
It's all a bit odd and rather sounds as if it might actually cost more if the bonuses come into play. But if they do it better then perhaps it's worth it.
But the real puzzle is that in a country where this is traditionally more widespread than in the UK, everyone connected to the change is denying it's privatisation.
Why would they want to deny that? The responsibility for hospital catering has just gone to an outside company but they were all okay with that being called for what it is.
The gov of NB has just taken responsibility for Extra Mural and tele-care from the two health authorities and given it to an outside organisation (the head of whom is a former Premier of NB, but I'm sure that's just coincidence).
The weird thing is it's apparently not going to save any money and might actually cost more with up front costs. (er, so why do it?)
It seems there are to be a series of targets to be met, with bonuses. (but nothing about penalties for failing?)
It's all a bit odd and rather sounds as if it might actually cost more if the bonuses come into play. But if they do it better then perhaps it's worth it.
But the real puzzle is that in a country where this is traditionally more widespread than in the UK, everyone connected to the change is denying it's privatisation.
Why would they want to deny that? The responsibility for hospital catering has just gone to an outside company but they were all okay with that being called for what it is.
#10
Re: They're still at it
I suppose if there is a mixture of providers (public/private) from the start, then complaints of "privatisation" are going to be far less controversial. In reality, the NHS already has significant private participation (Virgin Care, for example) but the public are in a state of denial that it's still a wholly public enterprise. You may have seen Stephen Hawkings letter's to Ceremy Junt (health secratery) this week, sounding the warning bell.
I'm willing to bet that the current NB minister for health will be working for the former NB Premier's company in a couple of years.
#12
Re: They're still at it
"G4S staff suspended from Brook House immigration centre over abuse claims"
Snouts in the trough.
#13
Re: They're still at it
The man in charge is rewarded with some paid time off.
Head of scandal-hit G4S detention centres is put on administrative leave
Funny thing...after some bad reports on one of the centres, things had apparently improved since a previous director was removed from his post (but not the payroll) after some problems. This was noted in a March 2017 report.
That didn't last long then.
And 'the man in charge' has previously had to quit following an earlier scandal.
I expect he'll get another post.
Head of scandal-hit G4S detention centres is put on administrative leave
Funny thing...after some bad reports on one of the centres, things had apparently improved since a previous director was removed from his post (but not the payroll) after some problems. This was noted in a March 2017 report.
That didn't last long then.
And 'the man in charge' has previously had to quit following an earlier scandal.
I expect he'll get another post.
#14
Re: They're still at it
If your blood doesn't boil when you read this article you must have ice in your veins.
Ten scandals since 2010
A bit...
Ten scandals since 2010
A bit...
Learndirect...Privatised by David Cameron in 2011, it was taken over by private equity and suffered a damning Ofsted report on its apprenticeship programmes. The Institute for Public Policy Research reported that the company received £631m of public money. A Financial Times/FE Week investigation found that after it was sold off, its parent company spent 84% of taxpayers’ money on managers and financiers, with many apprentices receiving no training. But another multimillion-pound bung will see it through to next year. The National Audit Office is investigating.
Or look at the east coast mainline railway line: handed back to the public sector by a failed franchisee, it made a tidy profit for the taxpayer. But that was too ideologically embarrassing, so the government sold it.
Or look at the east coast mainline railway line: handed back to the public sector by a failed franchisee, it made a tidy profit for the taxpayer. But that was too ideologically embarrassing, so the government sold it.