Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
#121
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
Automation will seep into everything, especially service based industries like finance, insurance, law.
Aren't you at least going to stay in Japan for the Olympics?
#122
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
The economy of Canada is a highly developed mixed economy with 10th largest GDP by nominal and 17th largest GDP by PPP in the world. As with other developed nations, the country's economy is dominated by the service industry, which employs about three quarters of Canadians.[22]
And if I didn't bother with the London Olympics I'm not sure why I would bother with the Tokyo ones either tbh.
#123
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Canada
Last time I was there I don't remember seeing a single hard hat unless a guy working on one of the office buildings I was working in was wearing it.
And if I didn't bother with the London Olympics I'm not sure why I would bother with the Tokyo ones either tbh.
Last time I was there I don't remember seeing a single hard hat unless a guy working on one of the office buildings I was working in was wearing it.
And if I didn't bother with the London Olympics I'm not sure why I would bother with the Tokyo ones either tbh.
#124
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
Not in my building they weren't but I'm sure those people exist.
#126
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
#127
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
#129
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
Politics, not impossible to do though. You take water, use it, treat it and return it to the river. I could look to see the population of red deer, but I won't bother, I wonder if it would qualify as a small town in uk, it is still 100 miles to either Calgary or Edmonton. Balzac will be the next burb of Calgary and then it will be Ardrie, the rapid growth along the qe2 is astonishing.
The main sources of water are the Athabasca River, the Saskatchewan River, the Red Deer River, the Bow and Elbow Rivers and the Oldman River - and guess what, that's where all the major towns in Alberta are.
Last time I checked, I seem to recall the maximum population limit for Alberta was estimated at 6 million based on the availability of potable water.
#130
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
The number is actually 310,000 this year, 320,000 next year, and 340,000 in 2020. Totalling 970,000 over 3 years.
Last year, it was 300,000. Not really plucked out of the air, and this year's number is a 0.03% increase over last year's numbers, it'll be a 0.03% increase next year and a 0.06% increase in 2020.
Last year, it was 300,000. Not really plucked out of the air, and this year's number is a 0.03% increase over last year's numbers, it'll be a 0.03% increase next year and a 0.06% increase in 2020.
Like I said, it's a myth that there is ample space. There isn't enough water and arable land. Most of Canada is a very hostile environment and not just because its cold.
And do we really want very high population densities in a handful of locations?
340,000 in a year is bonkers.
Personally I think that will be the end of it because the Democrats will win in the US in 2020 and I think it's painfully obviously one of the first things they'll do is reform the immigration system for the same reason the Liberals did it, i.e. more Democratic voters, so that will severely impact Canadian immigration.
Really the only figure that matters is net migration, like I said, all the indications are that immigrants are spending less time in Canada as more are admitted.
When I immigrated into Canada the standards were much higher. Then they let in you lot.
#131
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2014
Location: Done with condescending old hags
Posts: 1,194
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
Like I said, it's a myth that there is ample space. There isn't enough water and arable land. Most of Canada is a very hostile environment and not just because its cold.
And do we really want very high population densities in a handful of locations?
340,000 in a year is bonkers.
And do we really want very high population densities in a handful of locations?
340,000 in a year is bonkers.
We're 38th for population. 7th is Pakistan, with 190m.
You can say many things about the landscape, but the idea there's a 'shortage' of arable land is risible. It would just mean selling the food produced locally instead of exporting it (and while we're on that topic, why is Canadian flour cheaper in Sainsbury's than Superstore?).
#133
limey party pooper
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,982
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?
Canada has the 7th largest amount of arable land in the world (about 43,606,000 hectares - UN Food & Ag Organization FAOSTAT).
We're 38th for population. 7th is Pakistan, with 190m.
You can say many things about the landscape, but the idea there's a 'shortage' of arable land is risible. It would just mean selling the food produced locally instead of exporting it (and while we're on that topic, why is Canadian flour cheaper in Sainsbury's than Superstore?).
We're 38th for population. 7th is Pakistan, with 190m.
You can say many things about the landscape, but the idea there's a 'shortage' of arable land is risible. It would just mean selling the food produced locally instead of exporting it (and while we're on that topic, why is Canadian flour cheaper in Sainsbury's than Superstore?).
#135
limey party pooper
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,982
Re: Are Canada's immigration targets and numbers sustainable?