Kill the poor
Apr 16th 2013, 9:12 pm
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555
Kill the poor
Would you survive the cull?
http://m.smh.com.au/opinion/politica...416-2hygv.html
''A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20 per cent of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25 billion, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.
http://m.smh.com.au/opinion/politica...416-2hygv.html
''A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20 per cent of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25 billion, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.
Apr 16th 2013, 9:15 pm
#2
Mostly Harmless
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Semi-rural wonderworld, Brisbane
Posts: 15,109
Re: Kill the poor
Would you survive the cull?
http://m.smh.com.au/opinion/politica...416-2hygv.html
''A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20 per cent of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25 billion, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.
http://m.smh.com.au/opinion/politica...416-2hygv.html
''A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20 per cent of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25 billion, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.
Apr 16th 2013, 10:00 pm
#4
Still alive
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,994
Re: Kill the poor
It would also create a number of jobs in the struggling poor-culling sector.
Wonder if poor-culler would be added to the skills list by DIAC?
Wonder if poor-culler would be added to the skills list by DIAC?
Apr 16th 2013, 11:42 pm
#6
Banned
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,300
Re: Kill the poor
Would you survive the cull?
http://m.smh.com.au/opinion/politica...416-2hygv.html
''A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20 per cent of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25 billion, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.
http://m.smh.com.au/opinion/politica...416-2hygv.html
''A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20 per cent of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25 billion, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.
Apr 17th 2013, 3:29 am
#7
Shiny Arse Know All
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Adelaide, somewhere
Posts: 14,180
Re: Kill the poor
And public services would instantly be better by killing the poor who use them thus freeing up more resources for the rest of us (I'm assuming I don't fall into the poor bracket
)
Apr 17th 2013, 3:31 am
#8
snɐןɔ ʎʇıuɐs
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,558
Re: Kill the poor
Actually, lets add the lawyers to that list as well, no one likes them - score and rank everyone on a metric -
total assets owned/inherited
no. who would mourn them
The list gets descending ordered and you go down the list, culling, till you zero the debt.
Apr 17th 2013, 3:32 am
#9
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555
Re: Kill the poor
You live in Adelaide so you must be. Surely nuking Adelaide simplifies the task.
but that wouldn't do much for global over-population after all as an old boss used to say "it's only the scum classes that breed".
And public services would instantly be better by killing the poor who use them thus freeing up more resources for the rest of us (I'm assuming I don't fall into the poor bracket)
And public services would instantly be better by killing the poor who use them thus freeing up more resources for the rest of us (I'm assuming I don't fall into the poor bracket
)
Apr 17th 2013, 3:35 am
#10
Shiny Arse Know All
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Adelaide, somewhere
Posts: 14,180
Re: Kill the poor
apparently Adelaide is soooooo boring even the nukes don't want to visit so we're safe.Can I add all the car drivers that have cut me up on my motorbike to the list for early termination
Apr 17th 2013, 5:30 am
#11
Banned
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,300
Re: Kill the poor
Thanks to the defence stuff here, particularly the naval stuff, I think we're vaporised as soon as WW3 kicks off...
Apr 17th 2013, 7:50 am
#12
Mostly Harmless
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Semi-rural wonderworld, Brisbane
Posts: 15,109
Apr 17th 2013, 11:08 am
#14
Shiny Arse Know All
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Adelaide, somewhere
Posts: 14,180