Go Back   British Expats / Living & Moving Abroad / Australia / The Barbie

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 15th 2017, 11:24 pm   #226
idealist
 
stevenglish1's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,255
stevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beoz View Post
Well he has played the bigotry card. Why not. The other side have been playing it for years.

"Traditional believers will be vulnerable to discrimination suits and other kinds of bullying for their beliefs. Some may lose their jobs, promotions, businesses, political careers."

And they say we don't need a vote. Really?
It's already illegal to discriminate, this vote changes nothing on that front and it won't force churches to conduct same sex marriages. It literally changes nothing for the church, so we're back to good old discrimination for the sake of a cloud wizard's point of view. I think even that though is just a cover up for personally held prejudices, as if 'God told me to vote no' sounds less silly than 'well it just aint natural is it?'

I reckon it'll be heterosexual couples that kill the marriage cash cow for churches anyhow, once they get wind of a church turning down same sex couples most will steer clear. That's people power trumping prejudice, which is as it should be
__________________
If you don't read the news you're uninformed, if you do you're mis-informed. That's why I choose beer

Last edited by stevenglish1; Oct 15th 2017 at 11:31 pm.
stevenglish1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 1:18 am   #227
Beoz 
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 10,694
Beoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
What do you mean, provide real data (from today) that negates your point, or bother replying to your bullshit?
I didn't say it wasn't real, I said it was outdated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
For the first, because it's useful to point out the trend, particularly since Trunbull is going to have a bad week. For the second, well I do ask myself that question, frequently.


Actually the two party preferred tends to favour the incumbent, because they have control of the narrative, and the publicity. They can look like they are doing things, and can deliver bribes.

Of course, if they stuff it up, or have a tame press willing to lie for them, that can reverse, which is when they tend to roll the PM.

And PMs are usually out in front and preferred, purely because they get the publicity.
Nope, it favours the opposition. Always has always will. When you start talking bribes you start talking crap. You would not have a snowballs chance in hell with such unproven allegations in a court.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
And the coalition are gearing up to try to roll him, and replace with one the chuckle brothers mentioned. That's the issue - Trunbull will have to gut the far right in his party before Christmas if he's to cling on. He certainly has no wins to point to. And as more people get FTTN, more people have reason to hate him personally.
You mean Abbott is gearing up to roll him.

Well Abbott probably needs to look at his own constituent. Now that he has publicly running with the "No" vote which was suppressed before whilst this was not topical, his constituent is changing from a white, family values type area, to one of well travelled youth. His constituent is never going to vote Labor (it doesn't happen on the right side of the latte line), but decent independent will give him a good run and a potential topple.
Beoz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 1:22 am   #228
Beoz 
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 10,694
Beoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenglish1 View Post
It's already illegal to discriminate, this vote changes nothing on that front and it won't force churches to conduct same sex marriages. It literally changes nothing for the church, so we're back to good old discrimination for the sake of a cloud wizard's point of view. I think even that though is just a cover up for personally held prejudices, as if 'God told me to vote no' sounds less silly than 'well it just aint natural is it?'

I reckon it'll be heterosexual couples that kill the marriage cash cow for churches anyhow, once they get wind of a church turning down same sex couples most will steer clear. That's people power trumping prejudice, which is as it should be
Well not really. Churches (and other religions) are ruled by ancient scripts. Followers follow these rightly or wrongly.

What this guy is saying as that the church recognizes reproduction which can only occur between a man and a woman (he is correct), and god put a man and a woman on earth to reproduce (subjective).

Its not discrimination, its partly fact and partly outdated scriptures.
Beoz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 1:48 am   #229
idealist
 
stevenglish1's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,255
stevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beoz View Post
Well not really. Churches (and other religions) are ruled by ancient scripts. Followers follow these rightly or wrongly.

What this guy is saying as that the church recognizes reproduction which can only occur between a man and a woman (he is correct), and god put a man and a woman on earth to reproduce (subjective).

Its not discrimination, its partly fact and partly outdated scriptures.
It's discrimination, the fact that it's based on ignorance and fairytails does not excuse it, people use those silly books to mask their own prejudice. Some heterosexual couples can't procreate, is that because god hates them? Love is love. Someone needs to call that arch bishop twat out on his bullshit
__________________
If you don't read the news you're uninformed, if you do you're mis-informed. That's why I choose beer
stevenglish1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 1:49 am   #230
GarryP 
snɐןɔ ʎʇıuɐs
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,860
GarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beoz View Post
I didn't say it wasn't real, I said it was outdated.
2 hours ago for the first story, when posted.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beoz View Post
Nope, it favours the opposition. Always has always will. When you start talking bribes you start talking crap. You would not have a snowballs chance in hell with such unproven allegations in a court.
Nope, a dynamic government with good ideas is favoured because of positive press. It's only when the press turns against them that the opposition is favoured, usually when they have been demonstrably useless, or Murdoch is playing kingmaker/give me what I want.

Oh and you think strategic tax cuts and funding of infrastructure isn't a bribe? Why do you think the coalition federal government is handing over so much money to (liberal) NSW, and denying it from (labor) VIC? Outright corruption.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beoz View Post
You mean Abbott is gearing up to roll him.
Abbott is poison (in more than one sense) and I doubt the MPs would be stupid enough to back him. However I think they ARE stupid enough to back Dutton.
GarryP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 1:59 am   #231
Frequent Flyer Member
 
bcworld's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,884
bcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
However I think they ARE stupid enough to back Dutton.
They great thing about Dutton is that it will only take a tiny swing for him to lose his seat...something that looks quite likely at the moment!
bcworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 3:31 am   #232
Beoz 
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 10,694
Beoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
2 hours ago for the first story, when posted.
As I said, still miles ahead. Must be a worry for Shorten and yourself when your own party is ahead in the polls.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
Nope, a dynamic government with good ideas is favoured because of positive press. It's only when the press turns against them that the opposition is favoured, usually when they have been demonstrably useless, or Murdoch is playing kingmaker/give me what I want.

Oh and you think strategic tax cuts and funding of infrastructure isn't a bribe? Why do you think the coalition federal government is handing over so much money to (liberal) NSW, and denying it from (labor) VIC? Outright corruption.
Eh? Plenty going on in Victoria. Melbourne Metro, Level Crossing Removal, Tullamarine Freeway, etc. You know, states pay for this stuff too and NSW has plenty of cash, more people, and was neglected for years by Labor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
Abbott is poison (in more than one sense) and I doubt the MPs would be stupid enough to back him. However I think they ARE stupid enough to back Dutton.
Abbott is a publicity nightmare, but did lots of good things. We have been there before. Shall we do it again?

Dutton is on the rise (also a publicity nightmare). Look out.
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/the-rise-and-rise-of-peter-dutton-our-new-security-czar-20170718-gxdhz4.html

You need to look a little deeper rather than throwing out what the press feeds you.
Beoz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 3:33 am   #233
Beoz 
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 10,694
Beoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenglish1 View Post
It's discrimination, the fact that it's based on ignorance and fairytails does not excuse it, people use those silly books to mask their own prejudice. Some heterosexual couples can't procreate, is that because god hates them? Love is love. Someone needs to call that arch bishop twat out on his bullshit
Its also discrimination calling it "ignorance and fairytails".

I can't say I disagree, but then again I am discriminatory against religion.
Beoz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16th 2017, 4:38 am   #234
idealist
 
stevenglish1's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,255
stevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beoz View Post
Its also discrimination calling it "ignorance and fairytails".

I can't say I disagree, but then again I am discriminatory against religion.
We all discriminate against something, every one of us. Don't feel bad about it haha
__________________
If you don't read the news you're uninformed, if you do you're mis-informed. That's why I choose beer
stevenglish1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 19th 2017, 8:43 am   #235
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 4,422
the troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

The whole thing a total non issue. It is not my business to decide on the vote for equality of marriage. An elected government should be in a position to decide that from within parliament. Everybody knows what Turnbull's policy was. AS if there is not far more important issues, that actually do impact the day to day lives of people.


Marriage as an institution is of declining relevance anyway. Already in Iceland, more are born out of wed lock.


The same legal entitlements are fine, if that is what same sex want. Marriage really what's the deal with that? But fine go ahead. Just I won't partake.
the troubadour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14th 2017, 11:05 pm   #236
GarryP 
snɐןɔ ʎʇıuɐs
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,860
GarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Yes 61.6%
No 38.4%

79% voted

which is basically the polls before they did any of this.
GarryP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14th 2017, 11:13 pm   #237
Frequent Flyer Member
 
bcworld's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,884
bcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
Yes 61.6%
No 38.4%

79% voted

which is basically the polls before they did any of this.
$122m well spent!

75% yes in Warringah...come on Tony!
bcworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14th 2017, 11:16 pm   #238
GarryP 
snɐןɔ ʎʇıuɐs
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,860
GarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcworld View Post
$122m well spent!

75% yes in Warringah...come on Tony!
Western Sydney with the biggest no vote, Melbourne with the biggest yes.

Ahem.
GarryP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14th 2017, 11:18 pm   #239
idealist
 
stevenglish1's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,255
stevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond reputestevenglish1 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

As it bloody should be, and they're saying it cost less than 100 Million, which is just less than 100 Million too much. Going to be funny to see how no voters react to being told you lost, get over it.
__________________
If you don't read the news you're uninformed, if you do you're mis-informed. That's why I choose beer
stevenglish1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14th 2017, 11:19 pm   #240
Concierge
 
spouse of scouse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: Wirral UK
Posts: 6,818
spouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Yes No vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryP View Post
Yes 61.6%
No 38.4%

79% voted
.
Thank god that debacle's over. Now the f'n imbecilic government can pass the legislation and shut the f up.
__________________
An Aussie wool
spouse of scouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   British Expats / Living & Moving Abroad / Australia / The Barbie


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 pm.


Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1999-2010 BritishExpats.com