The Yes No vote
#46
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,900
Re: The Yes No vote
PS - That's also why Abbott and the social conservatives in Parliament wanted a postal vote. They know that the young millennials who form the core of the "yes" support are far less likely to participate.
#47
Re: The Yes No vote
Believing in traditional marriage is not irrational in the context of this current debate. It is basically the status quo in Australia and until recently, much of the western world. You may not agree with this standpoint but it is a perfectly acceptable standpoint to have. It's no coincidence that the west got to where it is today by doing, largely, traditional shit - which is why we're head and shoulder above the rest of the world
There are (at least) 2 sides to every story
There are (at least) 2 sides to every story
#48
Re: The Yes No vote
Interesting the last census had no religion at 30%
2016 Census: Religion
Should the rest of the religions state marriage can only be between a man and a woman, then the "yes" vote could be in trouble.
2016 Census: Religion
Should the rest of the religions state marriage can only be between a man and a woman, then the "yes" vote could be in trouble.
And consider Ireland...they had a vote there which was easily won in favour of SSM...their 2016 census recorded 10% no religion, 78% roman catholic.
#49
Re: The Yes No vote
I'd have more respect for the views of the religious voters if they followed every single tenet of their guiding God book.
Every single one.
Not just picking and choosing which ones suited them.
I'd have more respect for the views of those who believe that 'traditional marriage' was sacrosanct if they told us which particular 'traditional marriage' they believed in, and how long that particular 'traditional marriage' had, in fact, been traditional.
If they could also detail how they behaved towards people who were divorced or had been adulterous too, that would be an added bonus. Obviously, none of them would have been divorced or betrayed the ideals of marriage, because, well, that would just be hypocritical.
Every single one.
Not just picking and choosing which ones suited them.
I'd have more respect for the views of those who believe that 'traditional marriage' was sacrosanct if they told us which particular 'traditional marriage' they believed in, and how long that particular 'traditional marriage' had, in fact, been traditional.
If they could also detail how they behaved towards people who were divorced or had been adulterous too, that would be an added bonus. Obviously, none of them would have been divorced or betrayed the ideals of marriage, because, well, that would just be hypocritical.
#50
Re: The Yes No vote
With regard to marriage being a cornerstone of the west's success...surely marriage is almost universal...save for a few tribal variations here and there?
#51
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: The Yes No vote
So what is the point of following a religon or even listing you follow one?
#52
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: The Yes No vote
I think everyone (nearly!) knows that Malcolm Turnbull supports marriage equality...and has done for a long time.
I can imagine he fears a yes vote though...it will basically tear the Coalition apart. There's so many scenarios where this plays out badly for him. The conservatives in his own party loathe him...they're just not going to quietly accept a yes win...especially if the result is close. I read the other day that Abbott's electorate is right up there with those that are likely to deliver a high yes vote...I can't see TA voting in parliament representing the views of the people of Warringah if that's the case.
It will go on and on and on and he'll be made to look completely inept having spent that $122m! All the while the next election is looming...
I can imagine he fears a yes vote though...it will basically tear the Coalition apart. There's so many scenarios where this plays out badly for him. The conservatives in his own party loathe him...they're just not going to quietly accept a yes win...especially if the result is close. I read the other day that Abbott's electorate is right up there with those that are likely to deliver a high yes vote...I can't see TA voting in parliament representing the views of the people of Warringah if that's the case.
It will go on and on and on and he'll be made to look completely inept having spent that $122m! All the while the next election is looming...
#53
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: The Yes No vote
I'd have more respect for the views of the religious voters if they followed every single tenet of their guiding God book.
Every single one.
Not just picking and choosing which ones suited them.
I'd have more respect for the views of those who believe that 'traditional marriage' was sacrosanct if they told us which particular 'traditional marriage' they believed in, and how long that particular 'traditional marriage' had, in fact, been traditional.
If they could also detail how they behaved towards people who were divorced or had been adulterous too, that would be an added bonus. Obviously, none of them would have been divorced or betrayed the ideals of marriage, because, well, that would just be hypocritical.
Every single one.
Not just picking and choosing which ones suited them.
I'd have more respect for the views of those who believe that 'traditional marriage' was sacrosanct if they told us which particular 'traditional marriage' they believed in, and how long that particular 'traditional marriage' had, in fact, been traditional.
If they could also detail how they behaved towards people who were divorced or had been adulterous too, that would be an added bonus. Obviously, none of them would have been divorced or betrayed the ideals of marriage, because, well, that would just be hypocritical.
#54
Re: The Yes No vote
A bit touchy there mate! It was hardly a dig. I think it's clear he supports SSM...pretty sure almost everyone would agree with that. That being the case, if he made moves to do what you suggest...pretty sure you'd find he wouldn't be PM for much longer. Look at his record over the last 2 years...he is not in control, he capitulates to the conservative faction on every issue...the tail is wagging the dog. Sure, he could choose to sacrifice himself over the issue, but I'm not sure the party room even works that way.
#55
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: The Yes No vote
You see he is a member of a political party which more often than not does the best for all in Australia economically. For these reasons, the majority of people remain happy under a Liberal government. They have jobs and money.
But the Liberals are a coalition of different beliefs. This is a good thing. It means we are not plagued by unionism, beat up the wealthy mentality, and bad economic management that we see from the consistent narrow views in the Labor party.
In this case, the views of gay marriage is far from consistent across the party. Mal's choice is to put that to the people. After all we live in a democracy. If you want communist leanings, Labor is there for you. If you want freedom and choices, the Liberals are there for you.
The vote is all yours.
#56
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: The Yes No vote
That doesn't change the fact that he is a long time supporter of gay marriage.
You see he is a member of a political party which more often than not does the best for all in Australia economically. For these reasons, the majority of people remain happy under a Liberal government. They have jobs and money.
But the Liberals are a coalition of different beliefs. This is a good thing. It means we are not plagued by unionism, beat up the wealthy mentality, and bad economic management that we see from the consistent narrow views in the Labor party.
In this case, the views of gay marriage is far from consistent across the party. Mal's choice is to put that to the people. After all we live in a democracy. If you want communist leanings, Labor is there for you. If you want freedom and choices, the Liberals are there for you.
The vote is all yours.
You see he is a member of a political party which more often than not does the best for all in Australia economically. For these reasons, the majority of people remain happy under a Liberal government. They have jobs and money.
But the Liberals are a coalition of different beliefs. This is a good thing. It means we are not plagued by unionism, beat up the wealthy mentality, and bad economic management that we see from the consistent narrow views in the Labor party.
In this case, the views of gay marriage is far from consistent across the party. Mal's choice is to put that to the people. After all we live in a democracy. If you want communist leanings, Labor is there for you. If you want freedom and choices, the Liberals are there for you.
The vote is all yours.
#57
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: The Yes No vote
A bit touchy there mate! It was hardly a dig. I think it's clear he supports SSM...pretty sure almost everyone would agree with that. That being the case, if he made moves to do what you suggest...pretty sure you'd find he wouldn't be PM for much longer. Look at his record over the last 2 years...he is not in control, he capitulates to the conservative faction on every issue...the tail is wagging the dog. Sure, he could choose to sacrifice himself over the issue, but I'm not sure the party room even works that way.
#58
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: The Yes No vote
The people of Australia voted for a plebiscite in a majority at the last election. It was an election promise. You and every complainer had the choice during the election.
People also had the choice to vote for a Mediscare lie. Many did.
Now let me see. Lets weight this up. Hhhmmmmm. Yep. My vote went it the right direction.
#59
Re: The Yes No vote
Believing in traditional marriage is not irrational in the context of this current debate. It is basically the status quo in Australia and until recently, much of the western world. You may not agree with this standpoint but it is a perfectly acceptable standpoint to have. It's no coincidence that the west got to where it is today by doing, largely, traditional shit - which is why we're head and shoulder above the rest of the world
There are (at least) 2 sides to every story
There are (at least) 2 sides to every story
As for the west comment - it was traditional that blacks could be slaves, that women couldn't vote, that it was legally ok for men to beat their wives, that white men could legally remove Indigenous children from their parents. All of these traditions along with many many others have rightly been changed - not a rational reason to prevent equality.
My head spins that someone believes that they are somehow superior - preventing equality - to their neighbour, their relative, their work mate simply because of who they've fallen in love with. That, in no way shape or form is rational.
#60
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: The Yes No vote
I disagree. The only reason we are having this stupid debate is because a few years ago a Prime Minister took it upon himself to reword the description of marriage. What is traditional marriage? Go back through the ages and you'll find many different traditions - not a rational reason to prevent equality.
As for the west comment - it was traditional that blacks could be slaves, that women couldn't vote, that it was legally ok for men to beat their wives, that white men could legally remove Indigenous children from their parents. All of these traditions along with many many others have rightly been changed - not a rational reason to prevent equality.
My head spins that someone believes that they are somehow superior - preventing equality - to their neighbour, their relative, their work mate simply because of who they've fallen in love with. That, in no way shape or form is rational.
As for the west comment - it was traditional that blacks could be slaves, that women couldn't vote, that it was legally ok for men to beat their wives, that white men could legally remove Indigenous children from their parents. All of these traditions along with many many others have rightly been changed - not a rational reason to prevent equality.
My head spins that someone believes that they are somehow superior - preventing equality - to their neighbour, their relative, their work mate simply because of who they've fallen in love with. That, in no way shape or form is rational.