ABC Q&A
#31
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Hills District
Posts: 1,399
Re: ABC Q&A
Your point on the chaplains though I'm not sure is correct. Weren't they in schools before the last election? I disagree with them even though I'm not against religion. But the idea of it seems incredibly hypocritical. It also makes Australia look like a 1950's town in the US South.
#34
Re: ABC Q&A
Why do 'new' posters choose to join BE just to ask a question like this .... and then bugger off, presumably to enjoy seeing the fur fly?
#35
Re: ABC Q&A
...
Your point on the chaplains though I'm not sure is correct. Weren't they in schools before the last election? I disagree with them even though I'm not against religion. But the idea of it seems incredibly hypocritical. It also makes Australia look like a 1950's town in the US South.
Your point on the chaplains though I'm not sure is correct. Weren't they in schools before the last election? I disagree with them even though I'm not against religion. But the idea of it seems incredibly hypocritical. It also makes Australia look like a 1950's town in the US South.
#36
Re: ABC Q&A
I think Garry is talking about this issue: One small school, one big problem | Jacqui Tomlins
And many of the idiots who support this government think they got a liberal government.
#37
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: ABC Q&A
Here's what you do. Take matters into your own hands, look after yourself, and go private. That way you are closer to the top and those at the top actually have the bandwidth to listen to your ideas and complaints.
#39
Re: ABC Q&A
Who me? Name calling ...... A very traditionally dumb labour thing to do.
Here's what you do. Take matters into your own hands, look after yourself, and go private. That way you are closer to the top and those at the top actually have the bandwidth to listen to your ideas and complaints.
Here's what you do. Take matters into your own hands, look after yourself, and go private. That way you are closer to the top and those at the top actually have the bandwidth to listen to your ideas and complaints.
Do you defend the government for what happened in the article that fish.01 posted?
#43
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: ABC Q&A
Its a non issue. I had a chaplain at school. Brilliant dude. He taught religion, science, maths, coached the first XI cricket and served as the school social worker. He was approachable and many confided in him. I don't have a religious bone in my body but I have only good things to say about this guy. Don't be so quick to judge (I seem to say this a lot to you). You are rapidly running out of complaints about this government. If chaplains is where you are at now ..... Well keep digging.
#44
Re: ABC Q&A
Its a non issue. I had a chaplain at school. Brilliant dude. He taught religion, science, maths, coached the first XI cricket and served as the school social worker. He was approachable and many confided in him. I don't have a religious bone in my body but I have only good things to say about this guy. Don't be so quick to judge (I seem to say this a lot to you). You are rapidly running out of complaints about this government. If chaplains is where you are at now ..... Well keep digging.
Good for you to not having a problem in school that would require counselling from a trained counsellor. Many kids need this and many families can't afford it in their own. A teacher might be able to offer this service to a degree and that's really all we had in school. But why are we spending this money then on a non productive service? Stop avoiding the question and answer it. Do you support it or not?
#45
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: ABC Q&A
Except, you miss the point again. This isn't an attack on school chaplains. I'm sure there's plenty of caring individuals who do this role. The government want schools to specifically use religious chaplains and won't offer any money for anything else. These people are not allowed to offer religious counselling though which means this is a complete waste of money for any side of politics.
Good for you to not having a problem in school that would require counselling from a trained counsellor. Many kids need this and many families can't afford it in their own. A teacher might be able to offer this service to a degree and that's really all we had in school. But why are we spending this money then on a non productive service? Stop avoiding the question and answer it. Do you support it or not?
Good for you to not having a problem in school that would require counselling from a trained counsellor. Many kids need this and many families can't afford it in their own. A teacher might be able to offer this service to a degree and that's really all we had in school. But why are we spending this money then on a non productive service? Stop avoiding the question and answer it. Do you support it or not?
As the article says the there's one social worker for 115 students. That's a bit of a wasted channel of resource. Better off helping the wider community or multi tasking in the school - perhaps a bit of teaching. A good tidy up of more wasted welfare.