contemplating Australia
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by arkon
Well during a rant sometimes the facts get exaggerated,
#48
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
Where do you eat ? Most places are not like that, only the members only clubs.
#49
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by Siren & Brian
And people wonder why the term Whinging Pom gets used alot
#50
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by MrsDagboy
I think this just about sums up arkons post ........ .
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by arkon
Yes I was only refering to the members clubs, you can eat else where, of course you can, its just we spent some time in a camp site that had 3 clubs within a small radius, and thats what happened to us. BUT all you need to do is lie!! No honest gov, I don't belong to any other clubs, and yes I totally agree with all your clubs stated objectives, When I see you advertising thats only intended for 'members and their guests' If I'm not a member I avert my eyes and ears so as not to watch your advert, so please let me part with money and buy a burger and chips. Ta!
To me, there are differences between rules and rules that are enforced. Now I'm not saying that you should be dishonest but utimately by doing this all clubs that are half decent will get custom and patronage.
People go on about rules - or some detail in Australia but half the time you can just get on with it anyhow. It's how you let it effect you that decides on whether or not you will cope.
Badge
#52
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
Are you sure that you have to pay to transfer it ? Or is it the buyer that does the paying ?
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by arkon
No I had to pay as the buyer of 2 trailers, boat trailer, caravan and car,Oh and the boat, all cost me to transfer. And the buyer pays stamp duty.
On the subject of transfer fees and the like, I have never owned, or had the prospect of owning, a boat or trailer in the UK so don't know the situation there - however I would expect to pay a fee over a boat as it is a sizeable hunk of a structure - ownership of which should require fees/courses and the like - even a dingy has safety issues. I'd expect any government to levy a fee even if it stops a young teenager from buying a hunk of scrap just because he could, and then to recoup administrative costs.
You're not buying a bag of apples, you're buying a sizeable bit of kit whether or not it is a car or a boat. I don't mind paying a fee to own something that can kill, maim or block my driveway, cause an eyesore, cause an accident on the road..lol
that's the way I look at it cars and boats, like houses are serious business and attract serious prices and fees. lol.
Badge
Last edited by Badge; Jul 5th 2005 at 1:53 am.
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by arkon
No I had to pay as the buyer of 2 trailers, boat trailer, caravan and car,Oh and the boat, all cost me to transfer. And the buyer pays stamp duty.
Your words were "And if you should want to sell some thing with wheels on it then you pay again to transfer it! "
I agree that the buyer pays; I may not like it, but I accept that the system here is more of a user pays.
You have had to pay for 6 things because you have 6 things. I have only to pay for 2 things, as I have only 2 things. If these costs were spread out equally by person, then 8 things divided by 2 people, would equal we both pay for 4.
I think I prefer the current system.
Everything needs to be paid for one way or the other, Australia has chosen it's system, and like it or not, it is the way it is.
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by arkon
, Heaven forbid you win at 'who wants to be a millionair' they must have cheated!
"where Tecwen Whittock is accused of using coded coughs to guide Major Charles Ingram to the £1m top prize on the ITV1 quiz show: Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?. "
That was in the UK.
#57
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by arkon
Australia. It is one of the most Biggoted, racest places I have ever been to.
#58
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
Are you talking about http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2891957.stm
"where Tecwen Whittock is accused of using coded coughs to guide Major Charles Ingram to the £1m top prize on the ITV1 quiz show: Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?. "
That was in the UK.
"where Tecwen Whittock is accused of using coded coughs to guide Major Charles Ingram to the £1m top prize on the ITV1 quiz show: Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?. "
That was in the UK.
Last edited by arkon; Jul 5th 2005 at 4:26 am.
#59
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
The problem was that you were saying the seller had to pay.
Your words were "And if you should want to sell some thing with wheels on it then you pay again to transfer it! "
I agree that the buyer pays; I may not like it, but I accept that the system here is more of a user pays.
You have had to pay for 6 things because you have 6 things. I have only to pay for 2 things, as I have only 2 things. If these costs were spread out equally by person, then 8 things divided by 2 people, would equal we both pay for 4.
I think I prefer the current system.
Everything needs to be paid for one way or the other, Australia has chosen it's system, and like it or not, it is the way it is.
Your words were "And if you should want to sell some thing with wheels on it then you pay again to transfer it! "
I agree that the buyer pays; I may not like it, but I accept that the system here is more of a user pays.
You have had to pay for 6 things because you have 6 things. I have only to pay for 2 things, as I have only 2 things. If these costs were spread out equally by person, then 8 things divided by 2 people, would equal we both pay for 4.
I think I prefer the current system.
Everything needs to be paid for one way or the other, Australia has chosen it's system, and like it or not, it is the way it is.
Each year you have to re register.
I think the underlying point I was trying to make is that most people when they come here on holiday and then do their exploritory pre emmigration trips, start to think and be misled that everything is cheaper our here and when people ask will $50k per year be enough, they need to be informed that all is not a bed of roses and the fee's although relatively small soon mount up.
#60
Re: contemplating Australia
Originally Posted by Soi Oz
Loser.