Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia
Reload this Page >

An apology to asylum seekers

An apology to asylum seekers

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 5:53 am
  #76  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 6,775
the troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by paulry
This looks like a pointless discussion where different factions of people have long ago framed the argument and solution entirely differently and none are willing to compromise on their set-in-stone positions. Thank goodness the best faction is prevailing!
I don't see appealing to the Bogan vote as anything to be proud of. It is for government to rise about the narrow minded populist vote and lead.

A government whose only real policy was stop the boats though would find it hard to go back to nothing.

Thumbs down big time.
the troubadour is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 5:56 am
  #77  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 6,775
the troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by paulry
No not at all, I just don't see the point in arguing against entrenched positions until we're all blue in the face.

But tell me, why should Australia and the west bear the burden of the world's conscience?
Ok. Withdraw from UNHCR then and be honest about it. Hardly does the burden lay in the west. You know how many refugees are in Jordon, Lebanon, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Malaysia, to name a few. Far more than in the West. Absolute nonsense spoken on this issue.
the troubadour is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 6:27 am
  #78  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348
paulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by knockoff nige
I wonder if you wrote that and thought about posting it for a few minutes before hitting the button.

Helping fellow human beings isn't about attending to our guilt. We should help because we have the means to help. Australia and the west waste a disgusting amount of money to give ourselves a very comfortable living. I'm not suggesting that we need to overhaul our principles and beliefs, but we can acknowlegde that we can always do more. I think it's better to try and do that than pretend we're saving lives by putting our hand up and saying 'go away'.

This argument will continue and the best policy won't be considered because of the political agenda that is far more important to power crazy politicians.
What? As opposed to those who dump their thoughts to text and hit "Submit Reply" button without a moments thought - not even to spell check?

Yes we have the means to help. So do we fill the country with every waif, stray and opportunist who decides to rock up until the place is as broken and unpleasant as the countries these people have fled from? Is there a point when we must say "***k off we're full" or do we just keep letting them in until the appeal to settle here no longer exists?
paulry is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 6:37 am
  #79  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348
paulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by the troubadour
I don't see appealing to the Bogan vote as anything to be proud of. It is for government to rise about the narrow minded populist vote and lead.

A government whose only real policy was stop the boats though would find it hard to go back to nothing.

Thumbs down big time.
That doesn't sound very honest or democratic. Are you suggesting that governments should not implement the policy platforms they were elected to implement?

Originally Posted by the troubadour
Ok. Withdraw from UNHCR then and be honest about it. Hardly does the burden lay in the west. You know how many refugees are in Jordon, Lebanon, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Malaysia, to name a few. Far more than in the West. Absolute nonsense spoken on this issue.
So are these counties accepting the refugees into their populations or are they simply hosting the tent camps? Who is tenting and feeding them?
paulry is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 8:30 am
  #80  
BE Forum Addict
 
knockoff nige's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,404
knockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by paulry
What? As opposed to those who dump their thoughts to text and hit "Submit Reply" button without a moments thought - not even to spell check?

Yes we have the means to help. So do we fill the country with every waif, stray and opportunist who decides to rock up until the place is as broken and unpleasant as the countries these people have fled from? Is there a point when we must say "***k off we're full" or do we just keep letting them in until the appeal to settle here no longer exists?
I'm beginning to see alarming levels of racism in your posts. Maybe I'm reading them wrong. We need to process asylum applications from these boat arrivals. Everyone of them should have a right to apply and be heard. Currently they have no means of doing that. We don't need to accept every one of their applications but we do need to do more than send them home.

You seem to be more concerned about the boat people arriving than the people arriving on plane as if they will hold an asylum grant with much more respect and decency than anyone on a boat would.

What is the number that would make Australia full?
knockoff nige is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 8:52 am
  #81  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348
paulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by knockoff nige
I'm beginning to see alarming levels of racism in your posts. Maybe I'm reading them wrong. We need to process asylum applications from these boat arrivals. Everyone of them should have a right to apply and be heard. Currently they have no means of doing that. We don't need to accept every one of their applications but we do need to do more than send them home.

You seem to be more concerned about the boat people arriving than the people arriving on plane as if they will hold an asylum grant with much more respect and decency than anyone on a boat would.

What is the number that would make Australia full?
Ah yes, the racist card
paulry is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 10:41 am
  #82  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 6
TaffeyLewis is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by Beoz
In that case, PNG is fine for asylum seekers.
If you leave aside the principle that the broadest backs should bear the greatest burdens, perhaps.

But who wants to live in a world where the strongest and richest turn a blind eye to the suffering of the weak.
TaffeyLewis is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 10:57 am
  #83  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 6,775
the troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by paulry
Ah yes, the racist card
Sadly it has got to that. If they were white Saffa's fleeing on boats would the outcry be the same?
the troubadour is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 11:03 am
  #84  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 6,775
the troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by paulry
That doesn't sound very honest or democratic. Are you suggesting that governments should not implement the policy platforms they were elected to implement?



So are these counties accepting the refugees into their populations or are they simply hosting the tent camps? Who is tenting and feeding them?
Many of the kids are attending local schools in Lebanon. Creating some pressure on their system. Not sure about other countries, but I know the Palestinians have been lodging for a long time in Jordon. I know of Sudanese that had free access to the city living in Uganda, prior to coming to Australia. Plenty of Burmese living in squalid conditions and being exploited in Malaysia. (not in camps)
the troubadour is offline  
Old Mar 2nd 2014, 11:09 am
  #85  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 6,775
the troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond reputethe troubadour has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by paulry
What? As opposed to those who dump their thoughts to text and hit "Submit Reply" button without a moments thought - not even to spell check?

Yes we have the means to help. So do we fill the country with every waif, stray and opportunist who decides to rock up until the place is as broken and unpleasant as the countries these people have fled from? Is there a point when we must say "***k off we're full" or do we just keep letting them in until the appeal to settle here no longer exists?
It has been clearly stated that the country has a quota and not accept every body that rocks up on the border. It doesn't mean we should be appease the populist backlash with a total lack of empathy. Indeed Australia, being a settler country, continuing to import large numbers of migrants from around the world, has a moral obligation as well not only to accept economic migrants of benefit to itself, but to do its share in the international community as well.

A figure of 25,000 is certainly within capacity. And no it wouldn't become another Durban.
the troubadour is offline  
Old Mar 3rd 2014, 7:35 am
  #86  
BE Forum Addict
 
knockoff nige's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,404
knockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

This is quite a good read.

http://speakupforthose.wordpress.com...er-protection/
knockoff nige is offline  
Old Mar 29th 2014, 11:06 pm
  #87  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Beoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond reputeBeoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by knockoff nige
.... and that's100 days since an illegal people smuggling boat turned up in Australia.

Is this a bad thing?
Beoz is offline  
Old Mar 30th 2014, 12:19 am
  #88  
BE Forum Addict
 
knockoff nige's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,404
knockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by Beoz
.... and that's100 days since an illegal people smuggling boat turned up in Australia.

Is this a bad thing?
What's bad is the government not telling us of when boats are being turned back or how many have attempted to get to Australia or how they are handling the asylum seekers when they are turning them back or how many boats are we buying to give to these people smugglers.

The policy, I believe was to stop the boats. They are still coming but are being diverted. Boats wouldn't have got to Australia under the last policy change under the Rudd government as they would have been intercepted and not processed in Australia. This new policy doesn't include the human rights responsibility that the last one did. It ignores it.
knockoff nige is offline  
Old Mar 30th 2014, 12:31 am
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348
paulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond reputepaulry has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by Beoz
.... and that's100 days since an illegal people smuggling boat turned up in Australia.

Is this a bad thing?
Nope, it's a very good thing for two key reasons: Australia is seizing control of it's borders back from the people smugglers and ending the tragic losses of life that were taking place on the high seas.
paulry is offline  
Old Mar 30th 2014, 12:35 am
  #90  
BE Forum Addict
 
knockoff nige's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,404
knockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond reputeknockoff nige has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: An apology to asylum seekers

Originally Posted by paulry
and ending the tragic losses of life that were taking place on the high seas.
Prove it
knockoff nige is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.